Hi Carl
<br>I think you have a good idea to initiate seperate threads for each point. I suggest that you start each thread with a summary of the philosophy that is coalessing state the issue and List the accepted data for each of the 19 and 20 footers that are in play. I suggest that the Querbion data be used if possible. I think the goal should be to hammer out a consenus around the issue. not to write a rule quite yet.
<br>
<br>I agree with Wouter that beam should also be listed. It may turn out that wider is just so much faster that there is no way to keep it in the fold but I can still hope (grin) I think your summary will make sure every one is on the same page Or allow them to state an objection
<br>
<br> Take Care
<br>Mark<br><br>