| Re: Some corrections ...
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#130925 02/09/08 02:54 AM 02/09/08 02:54 AM |
Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,528 Looking for a Job, I got credi... scooby_simon Hull Flying, Snow Sliding.... |
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528 Looking for a Job, I got credi... | You could always buy a F16 now with the knowledge that you could beef it up to fit into the 104 class, its called hedging your bets.
My bet is that once you had a F16 you would not consider the 104 class as it would mean you would have to cart another 15 odd kilos up and down the beach and you would have to dumb the whole package down to match the other less competitive boats. Mind you starting off with an F16 would be one hell of an advantage as you could ballast it in all the right places. All, You need to add a lot more than 15kg to make a F16 into a 104. Hi Scooby, I personally am not interested in the 104 class. A 120 kg F16 would be more realistic. Why should people stuggle to make a boat down to weight with most failing to achieve. Why not propose a 120 min with the use of 5 kg max lead correctors much like the F18 class. Previous built boats can be granfathered to carry a little more lead but new boats must not exceed 5 kg of correctors. This should be discussed with current and future manufactures, not sailors who are not involved with manufature in any reasonable volume. Thoughts ?????? Are most boats failing? I'd suggest most are now close. Mine is close as is all new Stealth F16; Hans Boat was carrying lead to make it measure. If you want to TRY and change the class rules you need to be an owner and memeber of a NA; then you can propose class rule changes and then if appropiate they get VOTED on. I like the boat at 104/107. I'd be very interested in Rolf's view as he is building 3 boats at present. Doe HE think the MIN weight is about right?
F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD I also talk sport here | | | Re: Some corrections ...
[Re: scooby_simon]
#130926 02/09/08 09:46 AM 02/09/08 09:46 AM |
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 4,451 West coast of Norway Rolf_Nilsen 
Carpal Tunnel
|

Carpal Tunnel
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451 West coast of Norway | I think the min weight is about right. I dont know where our building project is going to end up yet, but that is really not the point in this discussion. Manufacturers are building down to almost min weight, and that is good enough. Building below min weight with ease would mean that the target isn't hard enough to reach.
What we have seen over the couple of last days is a clash of philosophies. The F16 concept was put together by some very smart and experienced sailors. These sailors came together and decided on what boat they would like to sail themself and what was practical in real life. What they came up with was a lightweight boat, but still heavy enough for low tech home construction. They had also felt other issues on their bodies, like unreliable crews, handling on land, righting from a capsize, cost, "arms races", durability etc. All the rules defining the F16 have gone trough many rounds of discussions to be the basis for a good platform. These rules are good rules as proven by the fleet sailing today. That was the history lesson. What I see Steven and Andrew doing now is something completely different. First off, I would dare to say that 99% of the class is happy with the min weight. I define the "class" as boatowners and builders, no others. I have not asked everybody in the class, but that is the impression I have. So if a very large majority of the class is happy, why change? Well, they way I see it, the only ones really interested in raising the min weight to something like 130Kgs would be manufacturers. Why? Becouse building a 16 foot catamaran at 130Kgs is easy and can be done with unskilled, really cheap labour. Meaning boats can be sold a bit cheaper and margins for the builder can be larger. "Making more money fast" as most spam said in the 90s. I think it is good that manufacturers make a living out of building boats. But I spend my money on what I want, not what the manufacturer wants to sell. It is a simple as that for me.
Now, Marcus and Danny is bringing something else to the table. They are argumenting a slight increase in min weight to make the target min weight achievable. I think changing the rules to accomodate this is the start of a very slippery slope. Having a hard to reach weight is good, giving all manufacturers a goal and not letting them relax in their building procedures.
Another isse has been that the F16 is not "a professional class". Well, what does Andrew and Steven mean by that? I suspect that deep down they think a class is not professional until the big guns like Bundy, Mich and others are active in the class? I can not understand how they can say that other aspects of the class is unprofessional so this is the way I interpret it. Well, I have sailed in the most "professional" class of them all, the Tornado class. I dont see how having professional sailors with manufacturer support in a class does much good for the class. The pros are there to win and make money, while we, the F16 class, really want our events to be about the people and having a good time. We are racing, but it's the social part which makes an event successful. So what if we suck at sailing, as long as everybody sucks equally?
Limiting crew weight? Why would we limit who can race these boats? It is a formula class! If you are very light or very heavy, set up your boat and gear accordingly. I have raced the Tornado at 200Kgs crew weight. With the right sails we were very competitive amongst other weekend warriors.
I dont see how we can get something meaningful out of this discussion, as we dont discuss facts but feelings. I think it is time to end this discussion, and let those class members who feel it is a good idea submit a proposal to the GC for the next rules revision. I also think this discussion as it has been conducted has done more harm than good for the F16 class. Prospective F-16 sailors/people watching this discussion would probably be scared off by what can look like a class where the rules changes every few months. Lets be smart and put the topic of weight to rest while showing the world that our class rules are there for a good reason. | | | Re: Some corrections ...
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#130927 02/09/08 11:37 AM 02/09/08 11:37 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe | I've written in the other thread that I'm done with this.
Therefor I won't continue here.
I find many claims made to be misleading, unfunded or simply not true.
I also find the discussion pointless from now on asn no official proposal is presented to the F16 GC that can be put up for a vote. Without that the class rules are what they are and class minimum is 107 kg.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: So what is the Viper's Texel handicap
[Re: taipanfc]
#130930 03/15/08 10:35 PM 03/15/08 10:35 PM | Anonymous
Unregistered
| Anonymous
Unregistered | Hey, many thanks to you and Alice for getting me a ride with David on his Blade yesterday. Enjoyed it a lot, even though we had few rig issues that slowed us down a little. Beautiful facility at CSC and interesting to race in a different environment. | | |
|
0 registered members (),
207
guests, and 48
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |