| Re: There here spinnakers for H16's
[Re: Surf]
#13652 12/03/02 03:02 AM 12/03/02 03:02 AM |
Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 170 Australia Jules_topcat
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 170 Australia | I also have heard about people trying to get the spinnaker action in the worlds but not the yourths. The question is why are they puting spinnakers on since they go alright without them any way? Well sorry to be mean but puting a spinnaker on the hobie 16 just doesn't seem right. With the youths having them at the worlds just isn't right and im a youth who wants to have a spinnaker on board my boat. To me a spinnaker on a hobie 16 is just more rope on board and since the youth guys aren't as strong as the big guys in the opens doesn't that mean the bigger and stronger you are the better you will be on a windy day. Well if thy go along with the spinnaker i will still go along i guess.
Jules
Jules_topcat
| | | Re: There here spinnakers for H16's
[Re: Surf]
#13654 12/04/02 03:54 AM 12/04/02 03:54 AM |
Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 170 Australia Jules_topcat
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 170 Australia | Hey just wondering for those people as dopy as me where do you vote.
Jules
Jules_topcat
| | | Re: YES SPINNAKERS
[Re: Fritz]
#13656 12/05/02 09:50 PM 12/05/02 09:50 PM |
Joined: Apr 2002 Posts: 78 Surf OP
journeyman
|
OP
journeyman
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 78 | Fritz I have been talking with a few people lately about the H16 spinnaker and now have to re-track a little. I am interested how this spinnaker idea will turnout within the H16 class. What is very interesting is just in the last two years the H16 seems to have increased in popularity with new H16 fleets popping up in Greece, and other countries, etc. Plus, the new movement within South America is taking off. Its exciting even though I am not quit sure why all the new interest in the H16 is developing. I of course like the fact that the H16 class has been so successful for so long and is now gaining even more strength as a class. I might add the H16 Trapseat group is growing as well. I for one am going to jump on the bandwagon and get an asymmetrical spinnaker (I have the Trapseat spinnaker already) for my H16 and try it out and see how this develops within the class. You are right that the interest is gaining in regards to spinnakers on current designs and new designs. I for one think a spinnaker on a H16 will make for an exciting ride. I have experienced sailing with a Trapseat spinnaker on a H16 and the H16 does exceptionally well with it (more performance gains). Fritz I am interested in what you said about the Dart 18 class, as I was wondering what happened to the Dart 18 class as it seemed that in a very short order they went for a large class (second to the H16) to almost nothing, like the TheMightyHobie18. Do you attest to this just because they did not change the boat and add a spinnaker? Come to think of it the H16 has change a bit sense the old days with new traveler system, new jib cut, etc., etc. Now it seems that a new downhaul and outhaul system will be added, which will not cost much to convert to or sell on current H16’s, and is a much welcomed addition to the H16 as the current system sucks. So lets just do what is best for the class, and if you do not want to sail with a spinnaker then great as the H16 class will continue to also offer non-spinnaker events. So don’t jump ship just because a spinnaker is introduced, just check it out and try it and go from their. Once again non-spinnaker H16’s are the norm and as a class we must determine what is best so help out and stick with us. To vote you can got to the North American Hobie Cat Assoc. website at www.nahca.org If you do not find where to vote just email the pres. of the assoc. | | | Re: No SPINNAKERS
[Re: alutz]
#13658 12/06/02 07:18 AM 12/06/02 07:18 AM |
Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 170 Australia Jules_topcat
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 170 Australia | Just out of curiosity why put a spinaker on a hobie 16 when you already get to play with a boat which HAS NOT BEEN DESIGNED FOR A SPINAKER. Im not saying they shouldn't put one on im just pointing out that the hobie 16 class is good as it is now and all your doing is spliting that up.
I was talking to a couple of great hobie sailors which are the best in the country, about the hobie 16 and a spinaker and this is what they said to me:
Julian dont bother about putting a spinaker on its just a mest on the tramp which makes it danger's and because since the boat hasn't been designed for one it would be a wast of your tine. Mike
Others have said the same thing and we're not talking about sailors which are just ok we are talking about the Australian champs + . If this goes through i think it wont help but will ruin the hobie 16 future.
Facts: 1: people love that it isn't the easyest boat to sail 2: They love they pitch pole because you need to balance it out properly 3: They lke your high off the water 4: It soesn't need a spinaker to run briliantly down wind.
Many more.
Well if it goes through i think im after one just to keep up.
Jules
Jules_topcat
| | | Re: YES SPINNAKERS with clean deck/ tramp
[Re: Surf]
#13659 12/06/02 10:31 AM 12/06/02 10:31 AM |
Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 95 Flensburg, Germany Fritz
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 95 Flensburg, Germany | Well, things have developped: - new designs allow a very clean tramp with a European Hobie snuffer - the HC 16 works excellent with the new SPI (only a few weeks or so on the market see Hobie Europe website), - the SPI adds fun to the boat and it is still easy to sail, really. - the HC 16 was not designed for SPIs, but what about the TORNADO, it also works out excellent! - There needs to be a coordinated interclass support: In Europe the major classes are HC 16 (for experienced guys, esp. mixed crews, newcomers, youth), the F 18 for heavier crews, mixed even female only, the Tornado as the Olympic Class. So showing this, these classes are starting to understand that there will be good support if the F18 and Tornados are supporting the HC 16 because they recruit their members out of these! And by the way, all (will) have spinnakers.
Fritz | | | Re: YES SPINNAKERS
[Re: Marco]
#13662 12/07/02 11:30 AM 12/07/02 11:30 AM |
Joined: Apr 2002 Posts: 78 Surf OP
journeyman
|
OP
journeyman
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 78 | Sorry this response is long but wanted to touch on a couple of points. I am no techie MACRO but from what I know from owning a 1997 H16 and from what I have heard the new Hobie 16s (1996 and newer) with the new improved integrated traveler system needs different jib cut than the older H16s to allow for more mast rake. The top H16 sailors could not quit get the mast rake they wanted and so in response to this need the Hobie Co. now offers a jib with a little different cut to allow for more mast rake. I think that is it in a nutshell. Oh yes Hobie will continue to make the old jib as well, indefinitely. JULIAN it would be great if you invited these top sailors to post within this thread not to prove what you said but just to get more detail from them on the topic. I also have had the opportunity to talk with some top sailors and will invite them to write on this forum. You see I get quit a different response especially from those in Europe and it seems there is much excitement about the spinnaker. Once again, they are not just jumping into but will be testing it out in 2003-04 at the ISAF youth worlds and I do believe at the H16 Worlds. As for the H16 NOT BEING DESIGNED FOR A SPINNAKER, I think that point really is not an issue as the H16 works well with a spinnaker just like almost any other multihull design. I have experience the H16 with a Trapseat spinnaker and it rocks. I think there may be some truth about you concern with splitting the H16 fleet and I believe that is why they are at this time just testing it out. I would hope before any decision is made that people would try the spinnaker out and vote. My main desire is to do what is best for the H16 class and if that means supporting or not supporting the spinnaker concept them I will do that as an individual H16 sailor and owner. Lets just stay calm and give it some time. Fritz once again I think you nailed it right on the head about inter class support. It seems to make sense to have the H16, F18, Tornado supporting each other. What is nice about this set up is you have 3 quite different designs and racing seens (meets various sailors needs and racing desires). What I have noticed is top sailors from these classes have been bouncing around within these classes. Mitch Booth sailed at the H16 worlds, he didnt do as well as he would of liked but from all reports he had a great time and many enjoyed having him at the worlds. I have conversed with Mitch via email and he is very supportive of the H16 class and as you have indicated it is a great way to recruit new sailors to the F18 or Tornado group, and is also great if people want to just stick within the H16 class as I am doing. I have to throw this one in but it is also nice that the H16 is able to accommodate people with disAbilities, which is the only cat class that is able to do this. I see many good things about this three-way class support, which I also think will enable as to be seen from the monohull community perspective as better organized and that we have focus. Some would say who cares what they think, well my friends lets face it many monohull sailors and groups hold much of the power in the sailing world and we would be wise to work with them and not against them. If you have not heard, they are talking about reducing the number of sailboat classes in the Olympics due to the Olympic committees efforts to make the Olympics more manageable, and other reasons. Therefore, with this in mind we need to really support the Tornado class so the monohull group does not try to kick out the Tornado to save one of their mono classes. I am not saying this is going to happen but its something to watch out for and a good reason (one of many) to support the Tornado class. Also, having a cat in the Olympics is a good for all multihull classes! One final note there is talk on the international level about locating a junior cat and so far the talk is to use the Dragoon. In some ways I think this is a good idea the only problem is our club felt that buying a Dragoon for $5600 for kids to use from the age of 11-14 is a bit much for a boat they will only use for 3 years. The cost in particular and size of the Dragoon is especially an issue for parents who want to buy a cat that their kids can grow into. In our club we use H16s and team them up with order kids that can handle the H16. This idea was developed by the Hobie Troop 22 group in Florida and works really well. We did think about the H14 as a junior boat and the kids in our club liked the idea but then they saw the Bravo and got even more excited about that boat, but we still need to try one out. Whats great is the Bravo sells for $2,500 versus $3800 for a wave, and $5600 for the Dragoon. Our local college has ordered two Bravos and two local sailors have also ordered Bravos, and the local dealer will have three on hand to sell. So the starting of a Bravo class is already moving. Still overall our direction is to follow Troop 22s junior idea with the H16s. The Bravo is a solo cat – check it out at www.hobiecat.com and go to the Bravo section and click on the video. Also you can see our clubs official boat selection list at http://www.sail-s.com/main/sail/Sailing_Group/Sailing_Group_Policies_&_Contacts.htm for both mono and multi. All my comments are just my point of view and I am in no way indicating that I know it all, but appreciate this forum and the great and respectful comments we get here. | | | Re: YES SPINNAKERS
[Re: Surf]
#13663 12/08/02 06:17 AM 12/08/02 06:17 AM |
Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 170 Australia Jules_topcat
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 170 Australia | Hello All im saying is that i dont really think that many people really want a spinnaker on their boat and also i am one of those people who wants one . I just dont lke the idea of having them at the worlds since im trying to get into the youth team but having the NO1 world youth sailor there its going to be hard . I also have given those sailors this site and they should be here soon, I hope. Last thing do you know for sure they are having the spinnaker in the worlds? Jules
Jules_topcat
| | | Re: There here spinnakers for H16's
[Re: mmiller]
#13667 12/10/02 03:27 AM 12/10/02 03:27 AM |
Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 170 Australia Jules_topcat
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 170 Australia | A man from my own heart. Sorry i all ways thought that the spinnaker idea was abit sus. Well i was just thinking who was the first person to say it will happen? And how much is it for a spinnaker? Well i really have to go byebye.
Jules
Jules_topcat
| | | Re: voting
[Re: CMerrell]
#13669 12/11/02 02:01 PM 12/11/02 02:01 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,252 California mmiller
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,252 California | The "ballot" included in the article in the NAHCA News is a "comment" issue rather than a vote. The IHCA is looking for comments regarding the proposed changes. Here is the text: "The purpose of this vote is to provide opportunity for members of the Hobie Class to participate in the rule change process and provide comment." Any vote for changes will be at the IHCA General meeting at the Tiger Worlds in Singapore in February. Here is a link to the August/Sept NAHCA News: http://www.hobiecat.com/sailing/racing/nahca/nahca.pdf | | |
|
0 registered members (),
175
guests, and 109
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,405 Posts267,058 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |