| Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#147100 07/01/08 04:41 AM 07/01/08 04:41 AM |
Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia Tornado_ALIVE
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia | Hey Wouter, I do not have a problem (if the foils do prove superiour)with the A Class adopting them, or if they decide to outlaw them. The descision will be made by the class and it's sailors...... The guys that matter. I do have a problem with you unsustained statements about the A Class and it's sailors such as.... everytime something REALLY interesting is being tried we see the class for what it really is. Scared shitless of any REAL development.
I'm not angry at the A-class, but rather at a sizeable portion of its sailors who at some instances celebrate the open, cool, development nature of the A-class, but when a new thing is tried become hysterical and almost immediately start throwing about "obsolete old design" and "kill off the class if not banned" kind of statements.
That is why I have so little patience with scared sailors in the A-class. If ever they get the upper hand and lock the A into a given setup by adding more rules and banning real development then they will have struck the biggest blow to the A-class in its 40 year existance. Notice how I had little to say on this subject until you started smack talking the A Class. How about you wander off to the next A class event and spew this BS. Don't forget your foundation to cover up those black eyes. By the way, I have never stated that the foils will be quicker or should be outlawed. What I have said is that the class will do what is right for it's sailors first and formost. I will also say again, you no sweet FA about what would be healthy for the class. The A class has been around for a long time and built itself up into one of the most successful and cometitive catamaran classes in the world. I have every confidence the class will take the correct path on this issue and you can just STFU because your opinion does not matter. | | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#147101 07/01/08 04:51 AM 07/01/08 04:51 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe | I do have a problem with you unsustained statements about the A Class and it's sailors such as....
No man, you have a problem with me ! All the rest is just window dressing to make your dislike (disgust) of my persona seem more respected. Like I always say. I have absolutely no problems if people hate my gusts on the internet or on public forums. I only care about factual correctness and I've got a pretty shiny public track record on that. Now lets get back to curved foils discussion and factual statements. I certainly hope you're not out of those ! Wouter
Last edited by Wouter; 07/01/08 04:53 AM.
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Wouter]
#147102 07/01/08 05:09 AM 07/01/08 05:09 AM |
Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia Tornado_ALIVE
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia | you have a problem with me ! And I will not argue that Now lets get back to curved foils discussion and factual statements. I certainly hope you're not out of those !
I am not part of that debate.... Only commenting on what would be good or bad for a class IF they are proven significantly faster. I would rather discuss your justification for the following BS comments. Please explaine why you felt it necessary to attack a class and it's members like you did below. everytime something REALLY interesting is being tried we see the class for what it really is. Scared shitless of any REAL development.
I'm not angry at the A-class, but rather at a sizeable portion of its sailors who at some instances celebrate the open, cool, development nature of the A-class, but when a new thing is tried become hysterical and almost immediately start throwing about "obsolete old design" and "kill off the class if not banned" kind of statements.
That is why I have so little patience with scared sailors in the A-class. If ever they get the upper hand and lock the A into a given setup by adding more rules and banning real development then they will have struck the biggest blow to the A-class in its 40 year existance. Please don't disapoint me Wouter........ Please answer. Don't run away dear Wouter | | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#147103 07/01/08 06:07 AM 07/01/08 06:07 AM |
Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 322 South Australia Marcus F16
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 322 South Australia | Stop baiting him........
BTW - you need a new signature now!!
"Land Lubber Alive" <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif" alt="" />
Marcus Towell
Formula Catamarans Aust Pty Ltd
| | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Marcus F16]
#147104 07/01/08 06:20 AM 07/01/08 06:20 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | Stop baiting him........
BTW - you need a new signature now!!
"Land Lubber Alive" <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif" alt="" /> At least we're not talking about airplane wings anymore. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
Jake Kohl | | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Marcus F16]
#147106 07/01/08 06:28 AM 07/01/08 06:28 AM |
Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia Tornado_ALIVE
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,669 Melbourne, Australia | Stop baiting him........
BTW - you need a new signature now!!
"Land Lubber Alive" <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif" alt="" /> Boatless Alive (or will be in another 2 weeks) But hopfully I can fix that fairly quickly May be a quick change of the logo from an 8 to a 6 | | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#147108 07/01/08 06:56 AM 07/01/08 06:56 AM |
Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 322 South Australia Marcus F16
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 322 South Australia | oh....i thought the boat was gone allready.!
who is storky?
Marcus Towell
Formula Catamarans Aust Pty Ltd
| | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Marcus F16]
#147110 07/01/08 07:07 AM 07/01/08 07:07 AM |
Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 539 taipanfc
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 539 | Steve Brewin. But please defer to Mr Factual in case I am incorrect. | | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Wouter]
#147112 07/01/08 07:29 AM 07/01/08 07:29 AM |
Joined: May 2006 Posts: 1,383 Kingston SE South Australia JeffS
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,383 Kingston SE South Australia | Wouter you hang crap on the A's every time they are having a successful comp. Just because the A's are a success it doesn't make your boat bad. Next time the A's are racing why don't you crack 10 beers and relax. regards
Jeff Southall Current boats Nacra 5.8 1703 Animal Scanning Services Nacra 5.8 1667 Ram Raider Nacra 18 Square Arrow 1576
| | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Hakan Frojdh]
#147113 07/01/08 07:35 AM 07/01/08 07:35 AM |
Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 539 taipanfc
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 539 | You can't score 1,2 one day and then end up in the middle of the fleet the next and call it a ghost! The conditions was ligher when the boat ended up in the middle of the fleet.
The two extrems in the beach cat worlds are probably Hobie 16 and the C-class and they attract different kind of sailors. The A-class have moved from the "C-class" type towards the "Hobie 16" type the last years which means that some sailors has left the class and but more have joined it. If the A-class goes into a new development cycle it will move towards the "c-class" type again, the last time it happened was the wave piercing design. The question is if the class can take this "beating" again without losing to many sailors? Since the class has been stable for many years now it has attracted sailors that like to sail, not to build, and will those sailors stay until it has stabilized again?
/hakan The Moth and A-Cat are the 2 development single-handed classes. Both have increased in numbers over the past years. Moth due to foil development, A-Cat due to being a hi-performance lightweight boat. Now the Moth allows development in foils and no min weight. Hull development really out of the question in future development, but possibly development in minimising air resistance like the Swiss mecano set recently launched. However the Moth has a mast height restriction which in some ways limits rig development here. Not possible to move to the refinement that is seen in the A-Class rig. A-Class only has a sail area restriction, which means that this area will always be a potential area of development. We saw that with Ben Hall's wing mast recently. It was amazing downwind in a breeze to see, but the excess weight aloft caused a pitching effect which hampered it in other areas. Also the A has hull development on its side. The worlds in Florida saw 9 to 11 different hull shapes, and there are other designs in Europe that weren't there. So maybe leave the moth to develop foils and go down that path. If that is your thing. The A will look at further refining the rig and hull shape. So each will fill their own niche and will attract those interested in those areas. In some ways no point in competing in the same development area as they are fundamentally different boats (cat v mono). | | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Hakan Frojdh]
#147114 07/01/08 07:52 AM 07/01/08 07:52 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | You can't score 1,2 one day and then end up in the middle of the fleet the next and call it a ghost! The conditions was ligher when the boat ended up in the middle of the fleet.
The two extrems in the beach cat worlds are probably Hobie 16 and the C-class and they attract different kind of sailors. The A-class have moved from the "C-class" type towards the "Hobie 16" type the last years which means that some sailors has left the class and but more have joined it. If the A-class goes into a new development cycle it will move towards the "c-class" type again, the last time it happened was the wave piercing design. The question is if the class can take this "beating" again without losing to many sailors? Since the class has been stable for many years now it has attracted sailors that like to sail, not to build, and will those sailors stay until it has stabilized again?
/hakan Awwwww come on! The A-class rules are 9 items long. That's nowhere near "becoming the H16"...that's a bit of a stretch don't you think? It's only one notch separated from the c-class - the only difference is the hydrofoil rule and a really light minimum weight.
Jake Kohl | | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: Hakan Frojdh]
#147116 07/01/08 02:19 PM 07/01/08 02:19 PM |
Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 7 Copenhagen, Denmark DEN1
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 7 Copenhagen, Denmark | So what about some information from one who actually was there and has curved dagger boards...
I was there and I just got a Nikita (designed and build by Nils Bunkenburg) with the curved boards.
First about the rules. Hydrofoils are not allowed, and that means that you may not add a foil with the only purpose to generate lift.
Then there is the question about the dagger boards, cause all newer boats (maybe except the Marström) have canted dagger boards, and they will provide some kind of lift. You might even angle them a couple of degrease so they aren't parallel to your sailing direction, if you think that will give you an advantage.
The hydrofoil commission was formed in the IACA to look into this matter, and in 2006 they came out with this text:
"Measurement control
The extreme beam shall not be more than: 2.3 meters (7 ft 6½ inches)
The beam shall be measured at right angles to the centre line of the craft at the widest point and including all fixed or adjustable apparatus with the exception of a normally accepted trapeze or retractable seat. (adjustable apparatus such as foils must be measured both completely down and completely up flush with the bottom of the hull). In addition, no part of each hull or the respective fixed or adjustable apparatus shall come closer together than 1.5 meters below the static waterline. If necessary the static water line shall be found by floating the boat fully equipped without the sailor on board."
During their work it had been in the text that boards should be straight, but they took this out of the text - SO THIS HAS BEEN CONSIDERED...
Therefore as things are today, CURVED BOARDS ARE LEGAL. The text about measuring the boards “flush with the bottom” should take care of T-shaped boards, as they won’t be able to be flush bottom.
The Boats. The boat on the pictures in earlier posts is not the Nikita, it's the Martin Fisher boat, and it has take a more radical approach placing curved dagger boards in front of the beam and even making them self tacking in a lose case. It had some fairly good races and some not so good. I really don't think that's the boat everybody got so scared of.
Then there are the Nikitas. We where 3 of them at the Europeans. Two of them where finished by Nils Bunkenburg (Jörg Horns and my own) and our dagger boards leave the hull vertically, meaning the case is in the center at the bottom and further towards the middle of the boat at the top of the hull. These are not as extreme as Bob's where. The top and bottom openings are more or less over each other on he’s boat, taking the tips of the boards closer to the allowed 1,5 meter than on my boat. Looking at the effect I think the conclusion is simple. In perfect conditions (as in a test tank) curved dagger boards are an advantage, but the more extreme you do it, the worse they get as you move away from ideal conditions. In light air (at low speed) you will drift more sideways. In choppy conditions you will have more turbulence. But in ideal conditions - you are slightly better of.
The racing area: Conditions where quite special. Usually one side of the course had a huge advantage due to tide currant at wind shifts, and if you got the best start and went to the side that had the advantage, you had a great lead. Not being able to challenge the leaders by going the other way on the next upwind makes it difficult for the fleet to challenge the leaders if they are good sailors.
The results: I can only speak for my self, but at the last Europeans in 2007 and the worlds in 2006 I was battling with Chris Field where we where always at a tie before the last race. This year he was 5 points in front of me before the last race, where I managed to turn it around. So no changes there. Last year I often sailed faster that Donald Beinke who ended up in front of me here. So no really big changes for me.
Maybe we should stop blaming the success of Bob in a couple of races on the boards entirely and maybe give him some credit for sailing well and setting he's boat up perfectly for the conditions and trimming he's new sail well. He's not a nobody in sailing who suddenly makes a good result!
About the rules: Let's keep the rules open. If the rules had been narrowed in every time someone got faster then the rest, the A-Class would still be a wooden boat with a triangular Dacon sail and non of us would care to race it. Let's remember why we where attracted to the class in the first place...
Regards Thomas Paasch | | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: DEN1]
#147117 07/01/08 02:38 PM 07/01/08 02:38 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | Thomas,
Thanks for your insight and experience. I believe you will find that the people that have been most excitable or shown the most dramatic reactions about this development here are not a-cat sailors.
Jake Kohl | | | Re: A-class has hydrofoil problems!
[Re: DEN1]
#147118 07/01/08 02:46 PM 07/01/08 02:46 PM |
Joined: May 2002 Posts: 1,037 Central California ejpoulsen
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,037 Central California | So what about some information from one who actually was there and has curved dagger boards...
I was there and I just got a Nikita (designed and build by Nils Bunkenburg) with the curved boards.
First about the rules. Hydrofoils are not allowed, and that means that you may not add a foil with the only purpose to generate lift.
Then there is the question about the dagger boards, cause all newer boats (maybe except the Marström) have canted dagger boards, and they will provide some kind of lift. You might even angle them a couple of degrease so they aren't parallel to your sailing direction, if you think that will give you an advantage.
The hydrofoil commission was formed in the IACA to look into this matter, and in 2006 they came out with this text:
"Measurement control
The extreme beam shall not be more than: 2.3 meters (7 ft 6½ inches)
The beam shall be measured at right angles to the centre line of the craft at the widest point and including all fixed or adjustable apparatus with the exception of a normally accepted trapeze or retractable seat. (adjustable apparatus such as foils must be measured both completely down and completely up flush with the bottom of the hull). In addition, no part of each hull or the respective fixed or adjustable apparatus shall come closer together than 1.5 meters below the static waterline. If necessary the static water line shall be found by floating the boat fully equipped without the sailor on board."
During their work it had been in the text that boards should be straight, but they took this out of the text - SO THIS HAS BEEN CONSIDERED...
Therefore as things are today, CURVED BOARDS ARE LEGAL. The text about measuring the boards “flush with the bottom” should take care of T-shaped boards, as they won’t be able to be flush bottom.
The Boats. The boat on the pictures in earlier posts is not the Nikita, it's the Martin Fisher boat, and it has take a more radical approach placing curved dagger boards in front of the beam and even making them self tacking in a lose case. It had some fairly good races and some not so good. I really don't think that's the boat everybody got so scared of.
Then there are the Nikitas. We where 3 of them at the Europeans. Two of them where finished by Nils Bunkenburg (Jörg Horns and my own) and our dagger boards leave the hull vertically, meaning the case is in the center at the bottom and further towards the middle of the boat at the top of the hull. These are not as extreme as Bob's where. The top and bottom openings are more or less over each other on he’s boat, taking the tips of the boards closer to the allowed 1,5 meter than on my boat. Looking at the effect I think the conclusion is simple. In perfect conditions (as in a test tank) curved dagger boards are an advantage, but the more extreme you do it, the worse they get as you move away from ideal conditions. In light air (at low speed) you will drift more sideways. In choppy conditions you will have more turbulence. But in ideal conditions - you are slightly better of.
The racing area: Conditions where quite special. Usually one side of the course had a huge advantage due to tide currant at wind shifts, and if you got the best start and went to the side that had the advantage, you had a great lead. Not being able to challenge the leaders by going the other way on the next upwind makes it difficult for the fleet to challenge the leaders if they are good sailors.
The results: I can only speak for my self, but at the last Europeans in 2007 and the worlds in 2006 I was battling with Chris Field where we where always at a tie before the last race. This year he was 5 points in front of me before the last race, where I managed to turn it around. So no changes there. Last year I often sailed faster that Donald Beinke who ended up in front of me here. So no really big changes for me.
Maybe we should stop blaming the success of Bob in a couple of races on the boards entirely and maybe give him some credit for sailing well and setting he's boat up perfectly for the conditions and trimming he's new sail well. He's not a nobody in sailing who suddenly makes a good result!
About the rules: Let's keep the rules open. If the rules had been narrowed in every time someone got faster then the rest, the A-Class would still be a wooden boat with a triangular Dacon sail and non of us would care to race it. Let's remember why we where attracted to the class in the first place...
Regards Thomas Paasch Finally some real info--thanks!
Eric Poulsen A-class USA 203 Ultimate 20 Central California
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
307
guests, and 103
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,405 Posts267,058 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |