| Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: pgp]
#243054 01/26/12 07:37 AM 01/26/12 07:37 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA David Ingram
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA | Yeah but Pete I really don't think Bob is evil. I'm just having a little fun with the situation I actually kinda like Bob although his choice of friends is suspect.
David Ingram F18 USA 242 http://www.solarwind.solar"Do or do not. There is no try." - Yoda "Excuses are the tools of the weak and incompetent" - Two sista's I overheard in the hall "You don't have to be a brain surgeon to be a complete idiot, but it helps"
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: pitchpoledave]
#243056 01/26/12 08:06 AM 01/26/12 08:06 AM |
Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 5,525 pgp
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525 | The opening was there so...
Pete Pollard Blade 702
'When you have a lot of things to do, it's best to get your nap out of the way first.
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: pitchpoledave]
#243067 01/26/12 11:56 AM 01/26/12 11:56 AM |
Joined: Oct 2011 Posts: 217 Palm Harbor, FL daniel_t
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 217 Palm Harbor, FL | I think an important point has been brought up though... The F16 was specifically conceived of as a 1-up or 2-up boat. It's great for each but not optimized for either.
The Olympic Committee has no interest in 1-up. I can easily see them going for a boat that has been optimized for 2-up crews of three-hundred pounds and it is reasonable that such a boat would be faster than an F16 that is sailed with the same sort of crew.
I also expect that they would be much more interested in a one design class over a development (even a limited-development) class. And I figure they would want a design that is already internationally adopted (which this new Nacra 17 is obviously not.)
I'm guessing they will have a hard choice ahead of them.
Daniel T. Taipan F16 - USA 213 | | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: daniel_t]
#243080 01/26/12 05:45 PM 01/26/12 05:45 PM | MarkMT
Unregistered
| MarkMT
Unregistered | I figure they would want a design that is already internationally adopted (which this new Nacra 17 is obviously not.) The evaluation criteria (pdf) have been spelled out pretty explicitly and that's not one of the considerations. The closest is this - Past performance and capability of the Manufacturer/Supplier Team – The manufacturer/suppliers of proposed equipment will be required to show that they have the experience and expertise and the means to distribute the equipment globally. Factors in this category include builders and distributors in place for global distribution without delay.
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: pitchpoledave]
#243081 01/26/12 06:08 PM 01/26/12 06:08 PM |
Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. Timbo
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. | When the Tornado was the Cat in the Olympics, was it considered a "Developmental Class" or was it One Design...or neither?
Blade F16 #777
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: mbounds]
#243095 01/26/12 09:20 PM 01/26/12 09:20 PM |
Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,307 Asuncion, Paraguay Luiz
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,307 Asuncion, Paraguay | Does it also come with a wing? Price? If you have to ask, you can't afford it. Probably, but I could mortgage something and I might consider stealing if the new olympic cat is winged, has curved foils and sails foilborne
Luiz
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: Timbo]
#243098 01/26/12 09:22 PM 01/26/12 09:22 PM |
Joined: Aug 2001 Posts: 1,307 Asuncion, Paraguay Luiz
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,307 Asuncion, Paraguay | When the Tornado was the Cat in the Olympics, was it considered a "Developmental Class" or was it One Design...or neither? The T was a development class.
Luiz
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: pitchpoledave]
#243104 01/27/12 01:48 AM 01/27/12 01:48 AM | Scarecrow
Unregistered
| Scarecrow
Unregistered | No the B class was the development class. Tornados were a one design. Not to be confused with a single manufacturer one design. | | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: ]
#243105 01/27/12 04:08 AM 01/27/12 04:08 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe | I still believe that the AHPC Viper (F16) stand the best chance of being selected over the "just recently announced designs"
I don't think the F16 class as a formula class is in any way likely to be selected. Mostly because I don't see any effort on that front to be slected, just as the F18 class is not actively seeking selection.
It is all up to the individual builders with their individual designs and the succesful F16 and Taipan parent classes guarantee that already lots of development have gone into these designs especially with regard to sailshapes. What more can you wish for?
Other then that the Viper is an excellent choice in my opinion and has the beginnings of a great fleet the world over. It fits the mixed crew criteria perfectly. Furthermore, the succes in the Taipan and F16 parent classes have led to lots of development related to the overall design and sailshapes especially.
What more can you wish for ?
Last edited by Wouter; 01/27/12 04:16 AM.
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: ]
#243106 01/27/12 04:09 AM 01/27/12 04:09 AM |
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 4,451 West coast of Norway Rolf_Nilsen
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451 West coast of Norway | No the B class was the development class. Tornados were a one design. Not to be confused with a single manufacturer one design. Tornado was one-design but with some freedom on sails, equipment, layout of equipment etc. As building methods went from plywood to sandwich and the introduction of tighter production control procedures the class rules were tightened up to reflect this. The last version of the class rules were very much one-design on the aspects that matters but with freedom to lay out control systems etc as you like. | | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: pitchpoledave]
#243108 01/27/12 04:50 AM 01/27/12 04:50 AM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,203 uk TEAMVMG
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,203 uk | To me, this 17 looks to be the best boat for the job. Nacra have got the world wide availability and have been propping up formula classes for 20 years now while other manufacturers seem to come and go as they feel. Nacra deserve a successful one design fleet and this 17 could be it. It's the best marketing move that they have done to date!
Last edited by TEAMVMG; 01/27/12 04:52 AM.
Paul
teamvmg.weebly.com
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: pitchpoledave]
#243114 01/27/12 07:54 AM 01/27/12 07:54 AM |
Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. Timbo
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. | So...you think the F18 is "...just too big and heavy as a consideration as a mixed crew."
But somehow a boat that is just 6 inches shorter is not? OK, maybe it's lighter, but once it's in the water, the working loads, and trimming the sails, etc. will be about the same.
You really think all the F18 and F16 sailors are going to bail and all jump on the "New F17"?
Really?
Don't hold your breath.
Blade F16 #777
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: TEAMVMG]
#243119 01/27/12 09:15 AM 01/27/12 09:15 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD Mark Schneider
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,116 Annapolis, MD | "Nacra deserves a successful one design fleet" Wow.... Deserves.... That is bass backwards.... The customer drives the process.. So... do you hear ANY talk on the beach that SMOD is missed? Do you see any upset among the formula sailors (F16 or F18) that development is too fast and they want to go back to SMOD .... (If any thing... some people are itching to ramp it up.) Had you ever had a conversation that resolved... What we REALLY NEED in cat racing is a boat BETWEEN 16 and 18 that out performs all of em... Maybe Nacra knows something of customers that they don't know of themselves. I know for a fact that customers don't think nacra deserves a dammn thing. A racing class needs critical mass of people who want to do the same thing..... Does the Nacra carbon 20 (I don't even know what the proper class name is) have that critical mass of racers anywhere? I read somewhere that Nacra new 20 sales have stopped as those people who wanted that kind of ride got one and the market is now full. 2 of the 4 (or so thought to be in NA are now for sale in the states. Seems to me that if the boat is selected for mixed multihull then it will have an instant class that will look like the Tornado class of the last 15 years...eg small and professional.... Otherwise..... I don't see it making a class and so it will be just another nice boat. (maybe NACRA will invest/sponsor handicap racing to give their SMOD boats a game to play in)... he he
crac.sailregattas.com
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: Timbo]
#243120 01/27/12 09:26 AM 01/27/12 09:26 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA David Ingram
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,906 Clermont, FL, USA | I'm not worried, in my opinion if the Nacra 17 is selected as the Olympic equipment the impact to the F18 class would be about the same as if the F16 (Viper) was selected. In my opinion if the Viper is selected the F16 class would take a bigger hit than if the Nacra 17 is selected. First thing that comes to mind would be fiddling with the class rules.
As for the class moving to a lower weight F18... still not worried, the F18HT isn't exactly posting huge numbers on the starting lines.
Is the multihull community (besides Bob) jonesing to get back into a SMOD class? There are a LOT of people that have been soured on the concept and formula has become the norm. As sexy and attractive as the Nacra 17 is it will have it's own baggage to deal with. No sleep lost here.
David Ingram F18 USA 242 http://www.solarwind.solar"Do or do not. There is no try." - Yoda "Excuses are the tools of the weak and incompetent" - Two sista's I overheard in the hall "You don't have to be a brain surgeon to be a complete idiot, but it helps"
| | | Re: New Nacra 17
[Re: David Ingram]
#243121 01/27/12 09:36 AM 01/27/12 09:36 AM |
Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 3,224 Roanoke Island ,N.C. Team_Cat_Fever
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,224 Roanoke Island ,N.C. | I'm not worried, in my opinion if the Nacra 17 is selected as the Olympic equipment the impact to the F18 class would be about the same as if the F16 (Viper) was selected. In my opinion if the Viper is selected the F16 class would take a bigger hit than if the Nacra 17 is selected. First thing that comes to mind would be fiddling with the class rules.
As for the class moving to a lower weight F18... still not worried, the F18HT isn't exactly posting huge numbers on the starting lines.
Is the multihull community (besides Bob) jonesing to get back into a SMOD class? There are a LOT of people that have been soured on the concept and formula has become the norm. As sexy and attractive as the Nacra 17 is it will have it's own baggage to deal with. No sleep lost here. SCREW SMOD!!!It's a greedy monster.
"I said, now, I said ,pay attention boy!"
The cure for anything is salt water - sweat, tears, or the sea Isak Dinesen If a man is to be obsessed by something.... I suppose a boat is as good as anything... perhaps a bit better than most. E. B. White
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
462
guests, and 94
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,405 Posts267,058 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |