| Kinetics possible on catamarans? #39135 10/19/04 10:05 AM 10/19/04 10:05 AM |
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... Mary OP
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... | Paul Henderson, the outgoing president of the International Sailing Federation (ISAF) says he is partial to catamarans because they do not benefit from kinetics as monohulls do. (Kinetics refers to the crew being able to manipulate their weight fore and aft or in tacking and jibing maneuvers to make the boat go faster.)
When I was sailing monohulls, like Thistles and Lightnings, many years ago, we used to use kinetics to “ooch” the boat forward and help it to get onto a plane or ride a wave better. In today’s dinghies the sailors are trained to do roll tacks and jibes in such a way that the boat comes out of the maneuver with more speed, and there are rules prohibiting this, but the rules are difficult to enforce.
My question is: Can kinetics be used to enhance the speed of catamarans? Most catamaran sailors I have talked to about this seem to think that kinetics CAN be effective with catamarans although to a lesser extent than with monohulls that are capable of planing. (And, of course, some catamaran sailors think that some catamaran designs ARE capable of planing, but let’s just assume we are talking about catamarans as displacement boats, which most of them are.)
So here are my two questions: 1.Can crew weight movement be used effectively to increase speed of the boat in certain circumstances? I know I was moving my weight forward and aft on the downwind legs in the Turks & Caicos to help me catch and hold onto waves. Is this legal or not legal? Does it help or not help?
2. Also, if you have water in your hull, can you use the movement of that water fore and aft to have a kinetic effect that could improve speed in certain circumstances? I know that if you have water in your hull, and if you are going downwind and the boat tilts forward as it is going down a wave, the water rushes forward and increases the potential for a pitchpole. But if that forward rush of the water could be used somehow, in much the same way that monohull sailors use their crew weight to ooch the boat forward, is there a way to make that forward rush of water beneficial? (i.e., increase the speed of the boat but not to the point of pitchpoling?)
Last edited by Mary; 10/19/04 11:01 AM.
| | | Re: Kinetics possible on catamarans?
[Re: Mary]
#39136 10/19/04 12:24 PM 10/19/04 12:24 PM |
Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,528 Looking for a Job, I got credi... scooby_simon Hull Flying, Snow Sliding.... |
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528 Looking for a Job, I got credi... | 1.Can crew weight movement be used effectively to increase speed of the boat in certain circumstances? I know I was moving my weight forward and aft on the downwind legs in the Turks & Caicos to help me catch and hold onto waves. Is this legal or not legal? Does it help or not help? Yes it is legal, and yes it helps. I need to re-read the rules, but you could probably justify a pump of the main and/or Kite to help catch a wave. Also, I always roll tack my boat (to a much lesser extent than those people that sail 1/2 boats), and it will help a little. Rocking and the like does not work becasue we use aparent wind so much that shaking the sails is counter productive.
F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD I also talk sport here | | | Re: Kinetics possible on catamarans?
[Re: Mary]
#39137 10/19/04 01:10 PM 10/19/04 01:10 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | Mary, I interpreted Paul's 'kinetics' comment geared more toward the fact that monohulls are heavier and have more kinetic energy while in motion. The monohull would be therefore less suceptible to tiny wind and water changes because it has more momentum to carry through waves as well as tacking. Whereas, on the other hand, catamarans are much lighter and do not have the same momentum - hence the sailors must be even more attentive and disciplined to adjust for the lack of mechanical energy. Mistakes are amplified on boats with less kinetic energy. I know I didn't really answer your questions - but that's because I don't know. I know that ooching your rudders does accelerate the boat (and is illegal) but the only times I'm been in waves big enough that moving my weight might be an advantage, it is usually blowing 15 or better and we're more concerned about keeping the bows high!
Last edited by Jake; 10/19/04 01:11 PM.
Jake Kohl | | | Re: Kinetics possible on catamarans?
[Re: Mary]
#39139 10/19/04 02:53 PM 10/19/04 02:53 PM |
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 4,451 West coast of Norway Rolf_Nilsen
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,451 West coast of Norway | Frank Bethwaite talks about kinetics as pumping, rocking and sculling (with swept back rudders). Ref: High performance sailing (warmly reccomended) Ooching is, of course, an sort of kinetics. Body position and movement is also an sort of kinetics, albeith quite legal within certain limits. Due to the great stability and speed of catamarans, most of the techniques employed in the dinghys will not work in an significant degree. In very light winds, pumping might help a bit, but the jugdes are murder when they see mainsails 'flicking'.  I agree with Mary, I also think ISAF's president advocates catamarans becouse kinetics are not very efficient there. I would really like to hear about efficient kinetic techniques usable on cats (besides our partial roll-tack), but I dont know about any.. | | | Re: Kinetics possible on catamarans?
[Re: Rolf_Nilsen]
#39142 10/19/04 04:01 PM 10/19/04 04:01 PM |
Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,528 Looking for a Job, I got credi... scooby_simon Hull Flying, Snow Sliding.... |
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528 Looking for a Job, I got credi... | I think you will find that the comments about boats that don't use kinetics also applies to the 49er.
The slow boats at the ollies are (mostly) sailing around where their speed does not generate a great deal of aparent wind and so the rocking/ooching can and does work. The Tornado and 49er are always sailed on aparent wind and so shaking the wind out of the sails is counter productive.
F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD I also talk sport here | | | Re: Kinetics possible on catamarans?
[Re: scooby_simon]
#39143 10/19/04 09:51 PM 10/19/04 09:51 PM |
Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 1,012 South Australia Darryl_Barrett
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,012 South Australia | All competitive cat sailors use their body weight positioning to advantage! Whether or not you call it "kinetics" or whether you just call it "trimming" it is all basically the same, with the same or similar results. When sailing downwind, with a following sea sailors position their weight forward to depress the bows and lift the transoms, this alows the hulls to travel more efficiently through the water with less "transom drag" and it also helps the boat better to "catch" waves. A competitive sailor will always try to move his weight contiually on a cat (whether they are inboard or on trapeze) to attempt to maintain the hull(s) at a stable angle with the minimum of pitch (pitch produces drag) similarly, particularly on trapeze, the weight is constantly shifted in towards the gunwale and out at full body stretch to minimise the heal of the cat with the minimum use of, dropping the mainsheet and pullimg it back on again. These are some of the obvious ways that sailors "use" their body weight in order to "get more" out of their boat. Some may call it just obvious trimming techniques, while others could call it the use of kinetics, which ever, it is apparent to most sailors of cats that the correct use of body weight positioning on a cat has a far greater overall effect upon the different in its performance than it does on any monohull, regardless of what it's called. Darryl | | | Re: Kinetics possible on catamarans?
[Re: Darryl_Barrett]
#39144 10/20/04 09:53 AM 10/20/04 09:53 AM |
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... Mary OP
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,558 Key Largo, FL & Put-in-Bay, OH... | I guess the problem is how sailing judges define "kinetics" and punish the use of it.
I don't think that proper weight distribution is considered to be kinetics. Moving inboard and outboard, fore and aft to keep the boat balanced is just maintaining proper boat trim.
Lasers are not allowed to do what judges consider to be excessive tacking upwind, because they get an additional thrust of speed out of each tack. This obviously is not the case with catamarans.
However, I do think that catamarans can pick up some speed and distance by jibing downwind -- and I mean jibing more times than is necessary for wind shifts, tactics or getting to the mark.
I don't know about with spinnakers, but main only or main and jib, if coordinated properly, I think you do get an additional forward thrust from a jibe, just from the impact of the main flying across the boat.
Is this kinetics? Or am I just plain wrong about jibing helping speed? | | | Re: Kinetics possible on catamarans?
[Re: Mary]
#39145 10/20/04 11:00 AM 10/20/04 11:00 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 778 Houston carlbohannon
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 778 Houston | Until I raced a Laser against some Olympic level sailors, I did not realize how powerful kinetics is or how important an issue this is. So let's make sure we are talking about the same thing. Kinetics is where you are using your body's strength (pumping) or movement of your weight to make the boat go faster. Some examples are, a Laser coming out of a tack faster than they went into it or J22 using the keel as a paddle by rocking their boat. You are mostly allowed to use this to initiate something (getting on plane, catching a wave, etc ) but not allowed to use it to continue something (stay on a wave, keep moving in light air, etc).
Let's ignore pumping. It's plainly illegal
Can you use kinetics on a cat? Yes, but it's limited by the stability and overshadowed by the power of the boat. In light air it helps. If you move your weight or pull the sail just right in a gybe or a tack you can accelerate the boat. On a gybe, I think, you are giving the sail one really good pump just as it comes across. Do it just right and it helps the stern across. Do it wrong and you can stop On a tack, I think, you are using the dagger boards and the sails. One good pump and one good rock. I tried a Laser style tack on my 14 (because a friend on a Laser said "you don't have anything to lose"). It helps maintain your speed in a tack and get moving, in light air. I never in any danger of being protested. I was just less slow.
Anouther factor is weight. The lighter the boat, the better it works. The difference between a sudden movement on a 400 lb cat and a 150 lb cat is amazing. One 2 man boats there is the problem of coordination of that weight.
Mary, you started by talking about the Wave. The situation is, you are going dead downwind in light air and the waves are overtaking you. So as the wave moves past the midpoint, instead of letting the boat slow as the wave passes the bow, you move forward at the right time, the boat pivots on the wave, falls down the backside of the wave. It works on a Hobie Wave because it has such buoyant hulls (it floats like a cork) and the tramp is so long. On an A you would have to move 3 ft in front of the mast.
As long as you didn't do it every wave, I would call it "imitating surfing. If you did it on every wave someone might protest. If I were protested, I would counter that most cats don't go dead downwind and do the same thing by heading up a little. I will keep your technique mind for those really sucky days when it pays to go dead downwind.
Just don't be obvious. I once witnessed a Lake Race were only one boat could find any air. As he passed the finish line, he was standing up, urinating off the stern, yelling "rocket power". He was DSQ'ed. Propulsion and unsportsman like conduct. | | | Re: Kinetics possible on catamarans?
[Re: Rolf_Nilsen]
#39150 10/22/04 05:24 PM 10/22/04 05:24 PM |
Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 351 Santiago, Chile Andinista
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 351 Santiago, Chile | What you all are talking about has nothing to do with kinetics, it's about hydrodynamics: The planning monohulls are flat in the back and v-shaped in the front, if there is enough wind, you move the weight back, so that only the flat part of the hull is in contact with the water. Then you get the boat planning and going much faster, because the HYDRODYNAMICS are optimal. The movement of your weight to acheive that is on the field of statics, not kinetics. Capisci?? Maybe the water inside the hull stuff has to do with kinetic, i didn't understand that, but for sure it's not as exciting as planning.
What about cats? don't know, havn't sailed my new cat yet... I guess there is no planning, but the cat will go faster anyway, so does it matter? Probably yes, when you get a monohull planning, like a LaserII, it is really FUN.. | | |
|
0 registered members (),
240
guests, and 26
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |