| Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: USA197]
#86066 10/04/06 08:57 PM 10/04/06 08:57 PM |
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 321 Albuquerque NM Banzilla
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 321 Albuquerque NM | I think of the relationship between talent (or whatever you want to call natural ability) and hard work/practice like a rubber band. Everybody is born with a rubber band of a certain size for a given activity. Practice and hard work stretch the rubber band, but if you start with a small rubber band you have a limited potential for the eventual size. If you start with a larger rubber band you have a greater ultimate potential, but if you don't put in work you can be outperformed by those with less ultimate potential who put in more work. Everyday there are people who have less potential but work harder to come out ahead of people with greater potential. The opposite of that is we all know a person who doesn't really try or put in the work but is naturally better. The kid who always aced the math test but didn't study, can run the fastest, or the guy who never practices or bothers to learn aerodynamic theory or the rules but always beats you around the course.
But, when you have a person with the greatest potential and put in the most work you have Michael Jordan, Peyton Manning, Glenn Ashby, Darren Bundock, etc. At the other end you have those who are so hopeless in an activity that they can never learn calculus, make a free throw, or round the weather mark first.
Sorry, but we all have limitations. Given infinite access to coaching, time and constant conditions there would still be a front of the fleet and a back of the fleet. With more time some could become the best, but not all.
Eric very well put!!! +1
[b] Sail Like you have a Pair
| | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: USA197]
#86067 10/04/06 08:57 PM 10/04/06 08:57 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | I think of the relationship between talent (or whatever you want to call natural ability) and hard work/practice like a rubber band. Everybody is born with a rubber band of a certain size for a given activity. Practice and hard work stretch the rubber band, but if you start with a small rubber band you have a limited potential for the eventual size. If you start with a larger rubber band you have a greater ultimate potential, but if you don't put in work you can be outperformed by those with less ultimate potential who put in more work. Eric Excellent.
Jake Kohl | | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: Jake]
#86068 10/04/06 09:56 PM 10/04/06 09:56 PM |
Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 81 Chicago, IL CatWoman
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 81 Chicago, IL | Last, but not least is the element of an extremely pronounced and strong motivation & hunger that makes one succeed (in addition to talent & hard work).
CatWoman
| | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: CatWoman]
#86069 10/05/06 12:01 AM 10/05/06 12:01 AM |
Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 736 Westport, Ma. U.S.A. Brian_Mc
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 736 Westport, Ma. U.S.A. | Eric put it very well, and Pat's example of Juani is perfect. I also liked Jake's analogy with music, and Catwoman's with fine arts. Reminds me of my experiences in art school. I took portrait sculpture. I thought that since we were all looking at the same person, everyone's work would resemble the model. There were only two out of twenty that captured a likeness. What a thrill to dicover I had a talent! I love music, but share Rolf's "talent". A few years later, I was a teaching assistant in that class. I can convey the process, and the skills to any interested person, but I can't share my talent in a way that is tangable enough to give it to others. I bet a lot of you are "talented" sailors, you just don't have the same degree of talent some of the stars do. I've never seen most of you, but we may know some people in common, like Rick Bliss, John Smith, and Chris Titcomb. I don't know where they'd rank in the national scene, but I'd guess they'd all do pretty well. John is a friend of mine, and I've crewed with him, and sailed next to him. Watching him fly around wether on an H16 or N20 is a joy. It's like the boat is an extension of him. That's a groove I'd strive for even if I never make it onto the race course. I suspect I'd get there faster by following you guys around the cans a few hundred times! <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> | | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: Tornado_ALIVE]
#86073 10/05/06 09:25 AM 10/05/06 09:25 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD Keith
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,459 Annapolis,MD | "In any field of endeavour, talent alone is not enough to win if it is not backed up with perseverance. The world is full of talented failures." - Cornelius Shields on sailing. Here's how it all boils down for me: When I win, it's due to unmitigated raw talent, meticulous preparation, and finely tuned skills. Unbeatable. When you win, it's due to unbelievably good luck, something bad happening to me (like falling off the boat), or the most outrageous gift rating that could ever be assigned to a boat. Unbeatable. So simple, what's all the debate about? | | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: Banzilla]
#86075 10/05/06 09:57 AM 10/05/06 09:57 AM |
Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 308 Reno NV Rhino1302
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 308 Reno NV | I am not sure excatly how you can call Risk either luck or talent (if that is what you ment) My point was that Luck and Talent are both useless concepts . If you really think yourself unlucky or untalented, what can you do about that? Go live in a cave and eat worms, I guess. Risk can be evaluated and mitigated. Skills can be improved. Luck is to Risk as Talent is to Skill. That's not to say that luck and talent aren't real, only that they aren't profitable ways of looking at the world. | | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: Rolf_Nilsen]
#86076 10/05/06 12:52 PM 10/05/06 12:52 PM |
Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 984 2017 F18 Americas Site Dan_Delave
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 984 2017 F18 Americas Site | There are many parts to sailing, some quite complex, that come into play making a good or great sailor. As a child prodigy, playing an instrument, there are fewer variables involved, IMHO. Sailboat racing is not so much who is the best at any given time or race but more who makes the least amount of mistakes. The thing involved that contribute to making fewer mistakes are:
Tactics How to play your competitor tactically is knowledge best gained during competition. It is hard to pretend to be in a tactical situation if you are not competing. Also every time you are racing but not with “your pals” you will have to be on your toes as to what others (strangers) may try to do to you. This is where National and World competition attendance really pays off. You will come back with tricks that locals do not know.
Rules Knowing how to use all the rules to your advantage. This may be more prevalent in monohulls but should not be ignored here. There are people that go around the course and know where they will get advantage on the nearest 5 or so boats so they can take advantage of the rules. There are many rules to know and interpretations of them. If you are comfortable with your knowledge you will be ready at the next situation.
Boat Speed Think about the last time you sailed next one of the best sailors in the world. That is a great opportunity to get information about how they sail. Presuming that you are not a hack, you will find that their boat speed is not Ferrari-like. They do not walk away from you they creep away from you. Every time you stall the boat they do not. Each puff they get just a bit higher from it.
I think that pure boat speed is a combination of on-the-water time and messing around with the boat and tuning. This may be the one thing, in sailing, that can be seen in a prodigal son (or daughter). There could be a feel that is just there for some.
Knowing the conditions The conditions are not just taken for granted by the best sailors who show up to an out of the area regatta. I have talked to a lot of the top sailors (out of their area) before a regatta starts and most of them already know the lay of the land. Whether they got it from local sailors or from tide charts, they know.
Luck I have heard many times “I’d rather be lucky than good”. This usually refers to the fact that they had a good regatta. They may have gotten a lucky break or two, but without the rest of the knowledge and skill they probably would not be where they are.
This is not a complete list. I was coming up with some more while I was writing but I had to leave it at this. Sailing is a game that we sail miles and win, sometimes, by inches.
“He who makes the least mistakes wins!”
Later, Dan | | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: Rhino1302]
#86077 10/05/06 12:58 PM 10/05/06 12:58 PM |
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 321 Albuquerque NM Banzilla
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 321 Albuquerque NM | Rhino, Sorry, but the use of the work risk http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/risk in this case still bothers me. I can see how risk can be controlled Ie. The more you are willing to loose the bigger the risk you will be willing to take. Which directly influances how much you might gain or loose. The might is the luck (gain = good, loose = bad) taking all other conditions, skills and talents into account. Skill(s) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/skill can be sharpened, and build on talent(s) that as mentioned before is/are innate http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/talentLuck is the tough part to get past. In my mind, luck or God's will or what ever you want to call it does play into the outcome of any event. If I decide to get up and walk away from my current job to change carreers, all of the above will come into play. First, my skill (sharppend talents) in deceiding what would be the best course for stability vs high income vs most stimilulating. If I choose to do something that I know I am not (yet) great at, my risks are much higher than if I choose to just change the area of IT that I am in. Top end sailors probably took a lot of risks and polished their skills to get where they are. If I did not have 5 other mouths to feed, I would probably be more willing to take the risks to get where I current think I want to be. As the children grow up and move out, the less risk is involved. Sam
[b] Sail Like you have a Pair
| | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: Banzilla]
#86078 10/05/06 03:39 PM 10/05/06 03:39 PM |
Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 308 Reno NV Rhino1302
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 308 Reno NV | That dictionary has a narrower definition of risk than what I'm using. You may find the wiki page on risk wiki page on risk more helpful. In racing it is valid to talk about negative risk (i.e favorable outcome). Maybe it's easier to think of the probability distribution of potential outcomes, where the outcome is measured in time relative to another boat. Not that I've ever heard of someone imagining a complete probability curve, but you might think someting like "if I go left when the rest of the fleet goes right there's a high chance of slightly unfavorable outcome vs. low chance of highly favorable outcome, the mean result is probably slightly negative". And then if you're towards the back of the pack and you've got a low throwout you might decide going left is worth it because you don't have much to lose. And if you end up losing by it, you can say "Well, I took a calculated risk that didn't pan out" instead of whining and saying "I was unlucky". | | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: Keith]
#86079 10/05/06 06:54 PM 10/05/06 06:54 PM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 337 Victoria, Australia C2 Mike
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 337 Victoria, Australia | "In any field of endeavour, talent alone is not enough to win if it is not backed up with perseverance. The world is full of talented failures." - Cornelius Shields on sailing. Here's how it all boils down for me: When I win, it's due to unmitigated raw talent, meticulous preparation, and finely tuned skills. Unbeatable. When you win, it's due to unbelievably good luck, something bad happening to me (like falling off the boat), or the most outrageous gift rating that could ever be assigned to a boat. Unbeatable. So simple, what's all the debate about? Thats what happens for me too! Wow - I thought I was the only one. Tiger Mike | | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: Rhino1302]
#86083 10/06/06 09:04 AM 10/06/06 09:04 AM |
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 321 Albuquerque NM Banzilla
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 321 Albuquerque NM | And then if you're towards the back of the pack and you've got a low throwout you might decide going left is worth it because you don't have much to lose. And if you end up losing by it, you can say "Well, I took a calculated risk that didn't pan out" instead of whining and saying "I was unlucky". Yes this is a rick, but not much of one, same thing as me going to work for Intel instead staying where I am at verses starting a new career in say civil engineering. Now, take the guy in 3rd place out of say a pack of 15, he makes a decision to go a different route for some reason. That is a much larger risk (way more to loose than gain). Yes, luck might play into that result also. Maybe he saw something nobody else did?. Now lets say that he stays the course and a strange puff comes along right up his alley way so to speak and puts him in 1st place and he wins, luck, talent or skill??????? We have all seen stranger things happen. Sam
[b] Sail Like you have a Pair
| | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: grob]
#86084 10/07/06 03:50 PM 10/07/06 03:50 PM |
Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,584 +31NL Tony_F18
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,584 +31NL | I recall Ellen Macarthurs drive on top gear, a lady that does not normally drive a car scored the fatsest ever lap time, perhaps if she had applied herself to motor racing instead of sailing she would have been the first female F1 champion. -Gareth
Actually the (mainly french) ocean racing community did not regard Ellen very highly as a sailor (not as a person). I for one do not think of her as someone with exceptional sailing "talent". She gained a lot of experience in a short time because she convinced people of her potential, this got her funds to pay for crew positions with some successful french skippers/teams which in turn snowballed to bigger things. (Sailing with the french top guys looks good on your resume). Maybe she, together with Steve Fossett, shows that with loads of training, experience, and a strong mind people can become a top sailors. | | | Re: Talent, or training and skill?
[Re: Tony_F18]
#86085 10/07/06 04:33 PM 10/07/06 04:33 PM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... hobie1616
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,582 “an island in the Pacifi... | Maybe she, together with Steve Fossett, shows that with loads of training, experience, and a strong mind people can become a top sailors. In Steve's case it didn't hurt to have a big pile of money. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" /> US Sail Level 2 Instructor US Sail Level 3 Coach | | |
|
0 registered members (),
221
guests, and 44
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |