| Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Dermot]
#87541 11/01/06 06:51 PM 11/01/06 06:51 PM |
Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. Timbo
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. | Great slide show Dermot! Nice job on the first place too, looks like you had plenty of wind.
Blade F16 #777
| | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Mary]
#87542 11/01/06 08:05 PM 11/01/06 08:05 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 12,310 South Carolina Jake
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,310 South Carolina | So why doesn't Hobie use it? Actually, Hobie did originally use linear polyethylene but I believe they went to the cross linked poly about the same time they started making the hulls thicker (or double walled I think). I believe they made the change to increase the durability of the boat (it also made it heavier).
Jake Kohl | | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Timbo]
#87544 11/02/06 03:04 AM 11/02/06 03:04 AM |
Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 915 Dublin, Ireland Dermot
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 915 Dublin, Ireland | Great slide show Dermot! Nice job on the first place too, looks like you had plenty of wind. Thanks Tim. I know that I am "off topic", but there are some video clips taken the evening before the event on www.catamaran.ie No. 1 is a good one of Amy Jayne, driving the Spitfire downwind from the wire.
Dermot Catapult 265
| | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: canibul]
#87547 11/02/06 10:28 AM 11/02/06 10:28 AM |
Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. Timbo
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,049 Sebring, Florida. | Old Towne Canoe sells a kevlar stip to glue onto the bottom of canoes for that reason, you could probably do the same with any cat, I don't know if it would "stick" to rotomolded plastic though. Maybe Hobie already sells one for their kyaks?
Blade F16 #777
| | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: BobG]
#87549 11/02/06 11:30 AM 11/02/06 11:30 AM |
Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 1,226 Atlanta bvining
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,226 Atlanta | If its not fiberglass its craaap! If its not carbon its crap. | | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: bvining]
#87551 11/02/06 12:29 PM 11/02/06 12:29 PM |
Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 984 2017 F18 Americas Site Dan_Delave
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 984 2017 F18 Americas Site | The Dart 16 weighs much less too.
Its in between the Wave and the Getaway in terms of performance. I was disappointed when I rented the Getaway, way too heavy This coming from a man with a carbon fiber A cat. I have to wonder why you even mentioned you were on a roto-boat when you think they stink so much? That is like a jet fighter trying a 2-seater Cessna and commenting on it's performance. What can you know about low performance catamarans? You sitting there all high and mighty on your speed demon, looking back at the rest of the World. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />Dan | | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Dan_Delave]
#87552 11/02/06 05:02 PM 11/02/06 05:02 PM |
Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 915 Dublin, Ireland Dermot
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 915 Dublin, Ireland | The Dart 16 weighs much less too.
Its in between the Wave and the Getaway in terms of performance. I was disappointed when I rented the Getaway, way too heavy This coming from a man with a carbon fiber A cat. I have to wonder why you even mentioned you were on a roto-boat when you think they stink so much? That is like a jet fighter trying a 2-seater Cessna and commenting on it's performance. What can you know about low performance catamarans? You sitting there all high and mighty on your speed demon, looking back at the rest of the World. <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />Dan The Dart 16 is not as slow as some people think, sailed singlehanded, it is rated faster than the Dart 18 and the Hobie 16. It points much higher than either of them. In a force 5, I have seen equal ability crews racing head to head, Dart 16 and 18, both two up. The 16 reached the top mark first because of its pointing ability. The course was triangular - a beat and 2 reaches. The 18 only caught up at the bottom mark and the 16 was ahead again by the top mark. Tim, The video clips were taken in September on the Friday evening of our Nationals at Lough Derg on the river Shannon.
Dermot Catapult 265
| | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Dermot]
#87553 11/02/06 07:07 PM 11/02/06 07:07 PM |
Joined: Sep 2005 Posts: 1,187 38.912, -95.37 _flatlander_ OP
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,187 38.912, -95.37 | The Dart 16 is not as slow as some people think, sailed singlehanded, it is rated faster than the Dart 18 and the Hobie 16. It points much higher than either of them. In a force 5, I have seen equal ability crews racing head to head, Dart 16 and 18, both two up. The 16 reached the top mark first because of its pointing ability. The course was triangular - a beat and 2 reaches. The 18 only caught up at the bottom mark and the 16 was ahead again by the top mark.
AHA! So there is capability of "more kick" than the Getaway in a roto boat. Dart 16 faster than the Hobie 16? Oops, I guess Hobie won't be building a speedy roto model (oh yeah, in 10 years...maybe). So there's NOT a market in the continental US for a boat such as the Dart 16?
John H16, H14
| | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Dermot]
#87554 11/02/06 08:19 PM 11/02/06 08:19 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe | Dermot, With all due respect, but your following statement is not true. The Dart 16 is not as slow as some people think, sailed singlehanded, it is rated faster than the Dart 18 and the Hobie 16.
Compare the SCHRS (ISAF) ratings : source www.schrs.com (lower number means faster) Hobie 16 = 1.16 Dart 18 = 1.18 Dart 18 cat boat (1-up only mainsail) = 1.19 Dart 16 = 1.28 Dart 16 cat boat (1-up only mainsail) = 1.26 Dart 16 spi = 1.25 Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Robi]
#87555 11/03/06 02:24 AM 11/03/06 02:24 AM |
Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 1,479 Thailand Buccaneer
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,479 Thailand | Isnt the Getaway a 16 footer? I would love to get my hands on a storm damaged getaway. I would double trap it, spinaker kit it and square top her. I would also put some wings on. Unfortunatly there is no way to repair a storm damaged getaway. Remember they are made of plastic... <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />
"House prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years. Although speculative activity has increased in some areas, at a national level these price increases largely reflect strong economic fundamentals." – Ben Bernanke – 2005
| | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: _flatlander_]
#87556 11/03/06 06:33 AM 11/03/06 06:33 AM |
Joined: Aug 2002 Posts: 545 Brighton, UK grob
addict
|
addict
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 545 Brighton, UK | The reason these boats sell well is not because they are made of plastic, it is because they are simple and robust. The reason they are made from plastic is that it is a cheap process, when the boats can be sold in large enough numbers. They can be sold at a similar price to a GRP boat and can therefore be sold at a higher profit. With the big companies profit is important. The majority of sailors don’t care about performance. And certainly performance doesn’t sell in large numbers. You could make a rotomoulded boat of equal performance to a GRP boat but the complexity required would not make it popular and it wouldn’t sell in large enough quantities to make it financially viable. As for reparability, they can be repaired, its not as easy as GRP, but you don’t have to do it that often. In fact has anyone ever seen a damaged rotomoulded boat? So to answer the original question Is there a market in the USA for a rotomolded boat with a little more kick than the Getaway? I think the answer is probably no. Gareth | | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Wouter]
#87557 11/03/06 07:12 AM 11/03/06 07:12 AM |
Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 915 Dublin, Ireland Dermot
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 915 Dublin, Ireland | Dermot, With all due respect, but your following statement is not true. The Dart 16 is not as slow as some people think, sailed singlehanded, it is rated faster than the Dart 18 and the Hobie 16.
Compare the SCHRS (ISAF) ratings : source www.schrs.com (lower number means faster) Hobie 16 = 1.16 Dart 18 = 1.18 Dart 18 cat boat (1-up only mainsail) = 1.19 Dart 16 = 1.28 Dart 16 cat boat (1-up only mainsail) = 1.26 Dart 16 spi = 1.25 Wouter Wouter, Wth All due respect - you missed the Dart 16 Sprint = 1.13. Now this does include a spinnaker, but if you take that out, you get approx. 1.15. Lower number than a Hobie 16. http://www.schrs.com/cgi-bin/doc/schrsratings.pdf
Dermot Catapult 265
| | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Dermot]
#87558 11/03/06 07:22 AM 11/03/06 07:22 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe Wouter
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,582 North-West Europe |
Sorry Dermot,
But why are you comparing a Laser 16 sailed singlehanded with mainsail, jib and spi with a doublehanded dart 18 or a singlehanded dart 18 with just the mainsail ?
Wouldn't it be a better measure to compare this Dart 16 rating with a Dart 18 or Hobie 16 that was being sailed in a similar way ? As in singlehanded with jib and spi as well.
Only then will we get a proper feel for how the Laser 16 can be expected to perform.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
| | | Re: Rotomolded Future
[Re: Wouter]
#87559 11/03/06 07:38 AM 11/03/06 07:38 AM |
Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 915 Dublin, Ireland Dermot
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 915 Dublin, Ireland |
Sorry Dermot,
But why are you comparing a Laser 16 sailed singlehanded with mainsail, jib and spi with a doublehanded dart 18 or a singlehanded dart 18 with just the mainsail ?
Wouldn't it be a better measure to compare this Dart 16 rating with a Dart 18 or Hobie 16 that was being sailed in a similar way ? As in singlehanded with jib and spi as well. Only then will we get a proper feel for how the Laser 16 can be expected to perform. Wouter
Wouter, All I said was: "The Dart 16 is not as slow as some people think, sailed singlehanded, it is rated faster than the Dart 18 and the Hobie 16." I was not including the spinnaker. The SCHRS for the Dart 16 singlehanded with main and Jib was always 1.15. Basically all I am saying is that even though it is a rotomoulded cat, it can be quite fast. Why are you calling the Dart 16 a "Laser Cat" That was just the name Laser marketed it under in the US.
Dermot Catapult 265
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
74
guests, and 94
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,405 Posts267,058 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |