Those Afura hulls look close enough to "good looking" to warrant considering them for the F12.
All the other stuff however will be changed. Reasons :
F12 is still cheaper F12 is still simpler F12 is still one or two steps easier to build and rig.
I've got the rig pretty much finished now and it is a really nice concept.
We just need to find easy to build hulls that do look nice at the same time. How easy is it to build the afura cat hulls ? Also 100 hours as the Paper Tigers hulls ?
Currently no shackles have been used in the design, actually one needs to get only the following from the chandlery :
-1- 1 ratchet block (no cleat) -2- 3 simple 30 mm sheeve blocks -3- 1 simple 30 mm sheeve blocks with becket -4- 10 saddles (eyestraps) -5- about 6 mtr 6 mm or 8 mm sheetline (swiftcord) -6- about 4 mtr 4 mm racing dyneema -7- 3 universal joints
All the rest is just lashings and knots.
This my friend equates to CHEAP, cheaper then the afura cat that does have quite a lot of chandlery shop.
Additionally, everything is home made EXCEPT the Dotan rudders and rudder boxed, but the rudder setup could be can be homemade as well.
Wouter
Last edited by Wouter; 01/07/0709:19 PM.
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: _flatlander_]
#94201 01/07/0709:12 PM01/07/0709:12 PM
Looking at the Cadet photos on Phil's site made me come to a realization. A kids boat needs to look like a toy in order to be attractive to a kid. An Opti certainly fits the bill as does this Cadet.
Jake Kohl
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: Wouter]
#94202 01/07/0709:38 PM01/07/0709:38 PM
We just need to find easy to build hulls that do look nice at the same time. Wouter
Is there a particular stumbling block to building this concept you proposed on the Youth Recreation Trend Page 12 last week?
Quote
We can use the building concept of this paper tiger to get a rather simple but modern looking F12 hull. Not torturing of ply involved, just bending flat plates in one direction.
The F12 simple hull? (I could not transfer the .gif) Now that is definitely a modern look.
Last edited by flatlander18; 01/07/0709:40 PM.
John H16, H14
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: Wouter]
#94203 01/07/0710:30 PM01/07/0710:30 PM
Easy to build? In 1979 I built a complete set of hulls over three weekends, and the hardware, mast, sails etc, are also "small" and as cheap as you can get. They cerainly aren't "rocket science", but a great fun little machine that gives great satisfaction to sail (and race) and they are light enough that one person can "roof rack" them by themselves (without getting a hernia). We bought two of them a few years ago for an association as a "trainer" for members of that associations kids and we picked up both of them for A$500.00 (A$250.00 ea) second hand. Rigging and derigging takes about 15 minutes (if you don't rush it)
Firstly, the money that would be spent on the Dotans, would easily bridge the gap when comparing the fittings on the proposed F12 and the Arafura Cadet.
Don't get me wrong but the fittings list posted earlier seems to be pushing the cheap side of the deal, for example, the telescopic battle stick.
I can't find any info on the Impara Cadet anywhere, except for a past yardstick listed with the Victorian Yachting Council, I will try and get to the club and take some photos, it really does look like a 12ft Mosquito, great little boat.
Regards
Matt Harper
Homebuilt Taipan 4.9
AUS 329 'GOT WOOD' SEEDY PIRATES RACING TEAM
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: mattaipan]
#94205 01/08/0708:10 AM01/08/0708:10 AM
Sounds like a perfect lake boat. While I'm going to be heavy for it, I'm going to use this opportunity to learn the basics of boat building AND have something that I can just throw on the roof rack and go sailing in less than an hour from garage to launch. Perfect for those late afternoon hookey sessions.
Only thing I'm gonna want to do is throw an MX RAY spinnaker on it <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: _flatlander_]
#94207 01/08/0708:44 AM01/08/0708:44 AM
Is there a particular stumbling block to building this concept you proposed on the Youth Recreation Trend Page 12 last week?
Yes, me wanting to allow these hulls to be build under 50 hours of work. This on the advice of phill. If you guys are really building a few of these then you better be able to pop a few out over the winter. Methods like tortured ply take to long.
I think I have a few solutions now. I'm down to only 3 "filler and tape joints". If a series is build then the prototype will be "filler and tape joints" taking a little time to build but after that the original hull can be used to make joints using shaped rods and that should really cut down on building time, allowing a group to pop out hulls rather quickly.
Also I'm now back at normal life responsibilities and so can only work on this design maybe 4 t 5 hours a week instead of 30 to 40 hours a week.
Here a more profiled look at the hulls (called 5 panel chined wave-piercer) that I think we can use.
Wouter
Last edited by Wouter; 01/08/0708:46 AM.
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: mattaipan]
#94208 01/08/0708:53 AM01/08/0708:53 AM
A single ratchet block in the mainsheet system to make holding the sheet more comfortable and a telescope battle stick tiller extension. However both can be replaced by respectively a normal block and a plain alu or glass tube covers with some grip material. Afterall this boat has no stays or a trapeze so a one-piece tiller extension won't stick out very far or hang up on the stays/trapeze lines. Like this the cost is maybe only 40 bucks.
I did a quick run of costs and it is way lower then I expected it too be. I need to be a more detailed calculation of cost but currently I'm just below the cost for a new US optimist dinghy by vanguard and that includes the dotan rudders and ratchet block. The rudder setup is now about 35 % of the total cost, with the professionally build R&J sleeved sail at 30 %. Those are the two most expensive items but can both be homebuild significantly cheaper.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: Wouter]
#94209 01/08/0708:54 AM01/08/0708:54 AM
is the hull design finished? If so could you publish your drawings so I can get them to a plotter? <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Also, would a simple H14 rudder setup work on this?
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: Wouter]
#94210 01/08/0709:08 AM01/08/0709:08 AM
The F12 looks like fun class, I might be interested in building one if you allow more "Bladish" hull design in the rules. I have built my Blade following the plans and after this experience it should be fun to try on my own design or experiment more on some other design (if wave piercing design is available).
Wife has to agree to take F12 catamaran instead of kayak that I promised to build her next winter though <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
-- Valtteri
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: MauganN20]
#94211 01/08/0709:23 AM01/08/0709:23 AM
is the hull design finished? If so could you publish your drawings so I can get them to a plotter? <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Also, would a simple H14 rudder setup work on this?
Regarding the rudders, I had the same scenario in mind, in the interest of getting on the water quickly. (However, I'm a big advocate of NOT canabilizing old boats, especially an existing H14, even if not in "race" condition, that a kid could enjoy).
I haven't had a chance to compare the dimensions of the Hobie rudder to the Dotan 20. dotan 20 If the area is close to the same, the 11 year old girl, who currently crews with Grandpa in 16A, can probably handle the Hobie system. The other two children (a 6 y.o. girl and 8 y.o. boy) that I'd like to have sail this boat, currently sail Prams and I think they'd struggle with the Hobie rudders.
Phill eluded to a homebuild ply box and rudder here somewhere?
John H16, H14
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: _flatlander_]
#94212 01/08/0709:30 AM01/08/0709:30 AM
Trey has more rudder systems laying around collecting dust that are orphansed from their boats, and I'm not building this for a 11 year old girl, I'm building it so I can putz around the lake when I'm bored at work and need to get out <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: MauganN20]
#94213 01/08/0709:49 AM01/08/0709:49 AM
is the hull design finished? If so could you publish your drawings so I can get them to a plotter?
It is finished in concept. I'm now working out the dimensions of the panels and the curves on the seams. But I must caution everybody that a large extend of hull design is where to place the volume and how to curve the keel-line. Those are things that need to be optimized by prototyping a boat, sail it and then adjusting the hull shape. Probably after the 3rd iteration the hull will be as we want it to be. This will take about 12 to 18 months if we work at it hard.
I don't have the resources to prototype the boat myself at this time so other people will have to do that. Also I think I've done my investment already in working out the design. I'm happy to see someone else do the prototyping and then I can adjust the design based on the feedback.
One alternative would be to buy the arafura cadet catamaran plans and build those hulls. Then you are assured that the hullshape is close to what you want and that the hull construction is dependable.
But if you are a little bit more adventurous then the new 5-chine wave-piercer hull is your candy.
I will be a few more weeks till I have figured out the right keel curve and bulkhead frames. I'm lofting the 5-chine hull in simulation software. But the design is coming, you can be assured of that.
Quote
Also, would a simple H14 rudder setup work on this?
I don't see why not ?
If the rudderboard area is large enough then by all means use any catmaran rudder system that is available to you.
The only other requirement of the rudders is that you should be able to balance them, afterall we are using the rudders as daggerbaord replacements and so unbalanced rudders will have very heavy weather helm feel.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: valtteri]
#94214 01/08/0709:52 AM01/08/0709:52 AM
The F12 looks like fun class, I might be interested in building one if you allow more "Bladish" hull design in the rules.
Certainly in the initial phase I shall not limit any hullshapes. Lets see what we all together come up with over the timespan of the next 2 years. After that we may settle on a signle hullshape if that is required.
I'm convinced wave-piercer shapes are possible.
Wouter
Wouter Hijink Formula 16 NED 243 (one-off; homebuild) The Netherlands
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: MauganN20]
#94215 01/08/0709:54 AM01/08/0709:54 AM
don't have the resources to prototype the boat myself at this time so other people will have to do that. Also I think I've done my investment already in working out the design. I'm happy to see someone else do the prototyping and then I can adjust the design based on the feedback.
I'll do it, as I'm more interested in the building process than the actual performance.
Quote
I will be a few more weeks till I have figured out the right keel curve and bulkhead frames. I'm lofting the 5-chine hull in simulation software. But the design is coming, you can be assured of that.
Sounds good. I'll shutup until then.
Re: F12 design and development
[Re: MauganN20]
#94217 01/08/0710:03 AM01/08/0710:03 AM