Your last paragraph and sentence have just caused me to lose any last vestiges of respect I may have had for you Wouter. Talk about being economical with the truth!!! You're behaving like a spoilt child and a total d!ckhead. As far as I'm concerned, as long as you believe yourself to be some kind of godhead to the F16 class I will reserve my right to ignore you.

So while I won't answer you directly, I will refute any lies, rumours and 'economical' truths that you post.

Wouter has not been 'excommunicated' from the class - he chose not to join! He told us he couldn't afford it!
The class is not allowing him "to pay for class stuff like the URL's" - we offered to pay for the URLs in full but Wouter chose for reasons best known to himself to refuse the offer while at the same time pleading poverty!!
For him to claim that the Technical Committee has no interest in hearing his opinion may have some truth - the point is they are all perfectly capable of forming their own views (that is why they are on the committee) and don't need Wouter's input to come to a decision. Also a claim that Wouter did 80% of the work in writing the class rules? Is that really relevant and what empirical data is there to arrive at a figure of 80%?

And what's with the bullsh!t remark of "take back the class"? - Oh, please Mr Wouter Hjinck sir, save us, save us, take back the class!!!!! As if! W@nker.