The old NMBR website is still up and running.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~whijink/NMBR/ Of course the basic working core was inspired by the Texel system and we all understand that that system is pretty good as it is. But NMBR did improve on it on several points.
OK, I have just spent some time looking over the NMBR proposal and see nothing that doesn't make sense.
Wouter, you mention "fine tuning" often...and say that 2005 will be the watershed year to collect and process such data. I presume that is where the cat went turtle. Where are we with regard to that in the spring of 2009?
Jake, what would you propose to adjust or modify?