Mark, that was pretty f'in disrespectful.

I said I wasn't going to comment on the particulars because I didn't have time to read through Wouters 30 pages of verbose text to figure out something that could probably be summed up in a paragraph. I didn't comment or try and discuss the particulars for that reason and explained it. I do, however, take issue with the notion we need to replace Portsmouth - because it's not broken...that was the point I was trying, and did, make.

Neither of you guys seem to be able to make a simple point without writing a book.

Show me the data where Portsmouth does a bad job. Show me some numbers and step away from the conjecture.