Announcements
New Discussions
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Rules Question [Re: C2 Mike] #109059
06/07/07 05:28 PM
06/07/07 05:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
scooby_simon Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
scooby_simon  Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
Quote
The key here is the very last few seconds when "S" started to round up. What did "P" do? If "P" jagged the stick and did an emergency bare away immediately after "S" changed course and a collision was still going to happen then I'd say "S" has fouled. If "P" delays by even a short time and then reacts or only a mild change of course then "P" will clearly have fouled. The devil is in the detail on this one.

As Eric says, the best thing is to avoid the situation in the first place.

Tiger Mike


Not the last few seconds. You need to consider the ability of the other boat to avoid. Yes they must react quickly, BUT they must have the ability to avoid the Stb boat. 2 seconds away from collission in this situation, there is not real way that the port boat could either bear off enough or head up quickly enough to avoid the changing course. In any kind of wind, 2 seconds is 2 to 5 boat lengths. This is not enough room.

Hence my comments above rearding the info I had from an international judge saying that "courses my be committed up to 200 yards away". The stb boat has to be REAL careful changing course when there are give-way boats around.

But as others have said, it is up to the protest ctte to document the facts and then make decisions based on these facts.

As I said to start with, IF I was the port boat I would pinch and wave the Stb boat over in front (and below) me, thus I am showing in no uncertain terms that I am avoiding in this manner and I expect them to hold their course below me. If I am on Stb, I will go below and wave them above me. Again making it clear I expect them to sail above me.


F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD

I also talk sport here
-- Have You Seen This? --
Re: Rules Question [Re: C2 Mike] #109060
06/08/07 08:58 AM
06/08/07 08:58 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 807
Hillsborough, NC USA
I
Isotope235 Offline
old hand
Isotope235  Offline
old hand
I

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 807
Hillsborough, NC USA
Quote
The key here is the very last few seconds when "S" started to round up. What did "P" do? If "P" jagged the stick and did an emergency bare away immediately after "S" changed course and a collision was still going to happen then I'd say "S" has fouled. If "P" delays by even a short time and then reacts or only a mild change of course then "P" will clearly have fouled. The devil is in the detail on this one.


Things aren't quite that simple. You cannot put a specific time or distance limit on "room to keep clear". There's far too much variation depending on the boats involved and the sailing conditions. For example, a small catamaran sailing upwind can slow down very effectively by letting the sails out. That's an easy technique for ducking. It's entirely useless for an 8000lb blue-water boat. She would have to act sooner in a cross and turn down to duck. Similarly, a laser can roll-tack in 2 seconds within one hull length. A tornado simply cannot. A port-tack laser traveling at speed but failing to cross 2 boatlengths from contact is still keeping clear. A tornado in the same circumstance is not.

RRS 16.1 states "When a right-of-way boat changes course, she shall give the other boat room to keep clear", where room is defined as "The space a boat needs in the existing conditions while manoeuvring promptly in a seamanlike way", and keep clear is defined as "One boat keeps clear of another if the other can sail her course with no need to take avoiding action..."

Therefore, each and every time S changes course (and here "course" means compass bearing), she must give P the opportunity to assess the change and respond. P's response must be prompt, but need not be unseamanlike.

Normally, if S and P are involved in a close crossing, then it is reasonable to expect P to watch S throughout. P need not anticipate S's actions, but she must recognize and respond to them without delay. S may change course, but she must give P sufficient time and space to see the change, decide what action to take, and do it -- all in a seamanlike way. Actions that might cause damage or injury are not seamanlike. S cannot force P to capsize, nor crash-tack, nor bear away so hard that she risks losing control. Generally speaking, if P delays responding, or does not exhibit competent seamanship, then P fails to keep clear. If P acts promptly and in a seamanlike manner but cannot keep clear, then S failed to give sufficient room. If P manages to keep clear, but had to perform an emergency or unseamanlike maneuver, then S failed to give room.

ISAF Cases 60 and 92 apply.

Regards,
Eric

Re: Rules Question [Re: Isotope235] #109061
06/08/07 09:26 AM
06/08/07 09:26 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 216
Lakewood, Colorado
MUST429 Offline
enthusiast
MUST429  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 216
Lakewood, Colorado
Ok, someone help me out here with "my perception" of a part of the rule.

Understanding up front, that given the closure speeds of spinny catamarans in a good breeze, the following may be impractical if not impossible.

It has always been my impression that once a ROW boat has hailed "Starboard" and the burdened boat has acknowledged that hail, with "Hold your Course", any additional course changes by the ROW boat that would prevent the burdened boat from keeping clear are if not against the rules, at the very least poor sportsmanship.

For that reason, while I ask my crew to advise me of an approaching boat even when we are the ROW boat, sometimes I do not hail, as due to tactical considerations I may not want to enforce my rights.

When I am the burdened boat and the ROW boat hailed for her rights, I always reply with "Hold Your Course". Not "OK" or "sure", or "i see you". By acknowledging with "hold your course" I feel as if I can make a change in course to prevent the collision, and not have to worry about a collision if I am then distracted from the approaching boat.

Lastly, given the radical change in sailing angles that changes in wind speed dictate on spinnaker boats when sailing downwind this is MUCH more difficult. But since BOTH skippers were experienced sailors on spinnaker cats it seems as tho there should be some discussion on how that particular problem could or should have been handled differently. The bottom line, for me anyway, is how do we sail fairly, safely and competitively, and avoid misunderstandings, collisions, and time spent in a protest room rather than socializing with friends.
I would also like to say that I am acquainted with both skippers and I am totally impressed with the way they have carried on the discussion. They have been respectful of one another and so far it has been a great thread to follow and learn from.

Stephen


Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain
Re: Rules Question [Re: MUST429] #109062
06/08/07 09:40 AM
06/08/07 09:40 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
scooby_simon Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
scooby_simon  Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
I'd say that "hold your course" has no sway in the rules, it would be a usefull chip to take to the room if need be.


F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD

I also talk sport here
Re: Rules Question [Re: MUST429] #109063
06/08/07 09:40 AM
06/08/07 09:40 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,293
Long Beach, California
John Williams Offline
Carpal Tunnel
John Williams  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,293
Long Beach, California
"Hold your course!" was eliminated in the last revision of the rules, almost four years ago. It went the way of "mast abeam!" <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />


John Williams

- The harder you practice, the luckier you get -
Gary Player, pro golfer

After watching Lionel Messi play, I realize I need to sail harder.
Re: Rules Question [Re: John Williams] #109064
06/08/07 10:18 AM
06/08/07 10:18 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 216
Lakewood, Colorado
MUST429 Offline
enthusiast
MUST429  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 216
Lakewood, Colorado
Quote
"Hold your course!" was eliminated in the last revision of the rules, almost four years ago. It went the way of "mast abeam!" <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />


Damn, I rather liked both of those.
John, Thanks for reminding me I am a bit of a Dinasour.


Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain
Re: Rules Question [Re: MUST429] #109065
06/08/07 10:47 AM
06/08/07 10:47 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,293
Long Beach, California
John Williams Offline
Carpal Tunnel
John Williams  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,293
Long Beach, California
Dinosaur?? Jeez - look at me! I never expected to be the guy that could say "Oh yeah, that was in the old rules about barques crossing triremes..."

I used to be the youngest guy on the course - now there are JCs, Treys, Siaus and Sarahs running around... <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />


John Williams

- The harder you practice, the luckier you get -
Gary Player, pro golfer

After watching Lionel Messi play, I realize I need to sail harder.
Re: Rules Question [Re: MUST429] #109066
06/08/07 11:21 AM
06/08/07 11:21 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 807
Hillsborough, NC USA
I
Isotope235 Offline
old hand
Isotope235  Offline
old hand
I

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 807
Hillsborough, NC USA
There are only a couple of places in the rules where a hail is required (or even mentioned). Those are RRS 19.1 (hailing for room to tack) and RRS 61.1(a) (hailing "protest"). Hails on the course of "starboard", "hold your course", "room", "no room", "proper course", "head up", etc. are not binding and don't enter into rule interpretation. Only actions count.

But (and this is an important but), such hails are still valuable. When two boats meet, it's best if both skippers know what's going to happen. That helps everybody to sail cleanly. After all, the right-of-way rules exist to prevent collisions. Hailing serves the same purpose. Oh, and if something does go astray and you wind up in a protest, having hailed may help show you tried to avoid contact.

Last weekend, I (sailing on port tack) called "hold your course" to a starboard-tack boat, just to be sure he saw me and knew I was going to keep clear.

Regards,
Eric

Re: Rules Question [Re: John Williams] #109067
06/08/07 11:24 AM
06/08/07 11:24 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 807
Hillsborough, NC USA
I
Isotope235 Offline
old hand
Isotope235  Offline
old hand
I

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 807
Hillsborough, NC USA
Quote
"Hold your course!" was eliminated in the last revision of the rules, almost four years ago. It went the way of "mast abeam!" <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />

Um, I think that was at least two rule books (about 8 years) ago.

- Eric

Re: Rules Question [Re: John Williams] #109068
06/08/07 11:38 AM
06/08/07 11:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 216
Lakewood, Colorado
MUST429 Offline
enthusiast
MUST429  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 216
Lakewood, Colorado
I used to be the youngest guy on the course - now there are JCs, Treys, Siaus and Sarahs running around... <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" /> [/quote]

I remember the days of sitting in wide eyed wonder on the Saturday Evening bull session after a day of racing. Alternately being informed, entertained and educated, depending on the story being told.
I also remember one evening being asked what I thought about some subject I really didn't know much about.
My reply was hey, my frame of reference is the last regatta, this regatta and the next regatta, I really don't have a clue. I remember feeling so lucky to be included in those sessions because I learned so much more listening and watching experienced sailors "draw in the sand".
Now, participating in those same sessions 25 years later, I also feel privileged to share some of what I have learned with the newer and younger sailors.
Quite honestly, even after 25 years, I often learn something by participating. This thread is a perfect example.

Stephen


Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain
Re: Rules Question [Re: John Williams] #109069
06/08/07 02:39 PM
06/08/07 02:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
F
fin. Offline
Carpal Tunnel
fin.  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
F

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,348
Quote
"Hold your course!" was eliminated in the last revision of the rules, almost four years ago. It went the way of "mast abeam!" <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />


So what is the appropriate response?

Re: Rules Question [Re: fin.] #109070
06/08/07 02:45 PM
06/08/07 02:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
scooby_simon Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
scooby_simon  Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
Quote
Quote
"Hold your course!" was eliminated in the last revision of the rules, almost four years ago. It went the way of "mast abeam!" <img src="http://www.catsailor.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />


So what is the appropriate response?


"Hold your course" !

It no longer has a meaning as far as the rules are concerned. But it still may help in the protest room.


F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD

I also talk sport here
Re: Rules Question [Re: Isotope235] #109071
06/08/07 06:15 PM
06/08/07 06:15 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 337
Victoria, Australia
C2 Mike Offline
enthusiast
C2 Mike  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 337
Victoria, Australia
Quote
Quote
The key here is the very last few seconds when "S" started to round up. What did "P" do? If "P" jagged the stick and did an emergency bare away immediately after "S" changed course and a collision was still going to happen then I'd say "S" has fouled. If "P" delays by even a short time and then reacts or only a mild change of course then "P" will clearly have fouled. The devil is in the detail on this one.


Things aren't quite that simple. You cannot put a specific time or distance limit on "room to keep clear". There's far too much variation depending on the boats involved and the sailing conditions. For example, a small catamaran sailing upwind can slow down very effectively by letting the sails out. That's an easy technique for ducking. It's entirely useless for an 8000lb blue-water boat. She would have to act sooner in a cross and turn down to duck. Similarly, a laser can roll-tack in 2 seconds within one hull length. A tornado simply cannot. A port-tack laser traveling at speed but failing to cross 2 boatlengths from contact is still keeping clear. A tornado in the same circumstance is not.

RRS 16.1 states "When a right-of-way boat changes course, she shall give the other boat room to keep clear", where room is defined as "The space a boat needs in the existing conditions while manoeuvring promptly in a seamanlike way", and keep clear is defined as "One boat keeps clear of another if the other can sail her course with no need to take avoiding action..."

Therefore, each and every time S changes course (and here "course" means compass bearing), she must give P the opportunity to assess the change and respond. P's response must be prompt, but need not be unseamanlike.

Normally, if S and P are involved in a close crossing, then it is reasonable to expect P to watch S throughout. P need not anticipate S's actions, but she must recognize and respond to them without delay. S may change course, but she must give P sufficient time and space to see the change, decide what action to take, and do it -- all in a seamanlike way. Actions that might cause damage or injury are not seamanlike. S cannot force P to capsize, nor crash-tack, nor bear away so hard that she risks losing control. Generally speaking, if P delays responding, or does not exhibit competent seamanship, then P fails to keep clear. If P acts promptly and in a seamanlike manner but cannot keep clear, then S failed to give sufficient room. If P manages to keep clear, but had to perform an emergency or unseamanlike maneuver, then S failed to give room.

ISAF Cases 60 and 92 apply.

Regards,
Eric



Exactly. The last change of course of "S" is what we are debating and time is very relevant but only in the context of "p"'s actions, the degree of those actions and (any) delay before they happened. I dare say the whole incident was over within maybe 15 seconds (if that). Also remember we are talking about a pair of Nacra 20's here, not a 20 ton keel boat. I was more interested in the actions - if P *immediately* took decisive action to keep clear of "S" then she should have a very strong case.

I will take a second to define "immediately" in this post which is the time a competent skipper would take to observe and react to the situation. ie: the time it takes to see the change of course, realize that a fast bare away is required and to begin executing that maneuver.

Any extra time beyond that definition will severely weaken "P"s case.

Tiger Mike

Re: Rules Question [Re: C2 Mike] #109072
06/08/07 06:25 PM
06/08/07 06:25 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
scooby_simon Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
scooby_simon  Offline
Hull Flying, Snow Sliding....
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,528
Looking for a Job, I got credi...
Quote
Quote
Quote
The key here is the very last few seconds when "S" started to round up. What did "P" do? If "P" jagged the stick and did an emergency bare away immediately after "S" changed course and a collision was still going to happen then I'd say "S" has fouled. If "P" delays by even a short time and then reacts or only a mild change of course then "P" will clearly have fouled. The devil is in the detail on this one.


Things aren't quite that simple. You cannot put a specific time or distance limit on "room to keep clear". There's far too much variation depending on the boats involved and the sailing conditions. For example, a small catamaran sailing upwind can slow down very effectively by letting the sails out. That's an easy technique for ducking. It's entirely useless for an 8000lb blue-water boat. She would have to act sooner in a cross and turn down to duck. Similarly, a laser can roll-tack in 2 seconds within one hull length. A tornado simply cannot. A port-tack laser traveling at speed but failing to cross 2 boatlengths from contact is still keeping clear. A tornado in the same circumstance is not.

RRS 16.1 states "When a right-of-way boat changes course, she shall give the other boat room to keep clear", where room is defined as "The space a boat needs in the existing conditions while manoeuvring promptly in a seamanlike way", and keep clear is defined as "One boat keeps clear of another if the other can sail her course with no need to take avoiding action..."

Therefore, each and every time S changes course (and here "course" means compass bearing), she must give P the opportunity to assess the change and respond. P's response must be prompt, but need not be unseamanlike.

Normally, if S and P are involved in a close crossing, then it is reasonable to expect P to watch S throughout. P need not anticipate S's actions, but she must recognize and respond to them without delay. S may change course, but she must give P sufficient time and space to see the change, decide what action to take, and do it -- all in a seamanlike way. Actions that might cause damage or injury are not seamanlike. S cannot force P to capsize, nor crash-tack, nor bear away so hard that she risks losing control. Generally speaking, if P delays responding, or does not exhibit competent seamanship, then P fails to keep clear. If P acts promptly and in a seamanlike manner but cannot keep clear, then S failed to give sufficient room. If P manages to keep clear, but had to perform an emergency or unseamanlike maneuver, then S failed to give room.

ISAF Cases 60 and 92 apply.

Regards,
Eric



Exactly. The last change of course of "S" is what we are debating and time is very relevant but only in the context of "p"'s actions, the degree of those actions and (any) delay before they happened. I dare say the whole incident was over within maybe 15 seconds (if that). Also remember we are talking about a pair of Nacra 20's here, not a 20 ton keel boat. I was more interested in the actions - if P *immediately* took decisive action to keep clear of "S" then she should have a very strong case.

I will take a second to define "immediately" in this post which is the time a competent skipper would take to observe and react to the situation. ie: the time it takes to see the change of course, realize that a fast bare away is required and to begin executing that maneuver.

Any extra time beyond that definition will severely weaken "P"s case.

Tiger Mike


But remember this time also includes time for the crew to move back, the helm to ease sheets. remember there is "seamanlike" in the definition.


F16 - GBR 553 - SOLD

I also talk sport here
Re: Rules Question [Re: scooby_simon] #109073
06/08/07 06:31 PM
06/08/07 06:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 337
Victoria, Australia
C2 Mike Offline
enthusiast
C2 Mike  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 337
Victoria, Australia
Quote

But remember this time also includes time for the crew to move back, the helm to ease sheets. remember there is "seamanlike" in the definition.


Doesn't "the time it takes to see the change of course, realize that a fast bare away is required and to begin executing that maneuver." cover that???

Tiger Mike

Re: Rules Question [Re: JoeLeonard] #109074
06/08/07 09:31 PM
06/08/07 09:31 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 425
Toledo, Ohio (western end of ...
Mike Fahle Offline
addict
Mike Fahle  Offline
addict

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 425
Toledo, Ohio (western end of ...
Dick Rose addresses this situation exactly in his regular rules column in the latest Sailing World magazine (June, 2007). Please read it if you haven't already.

I have read the whole discussion and would like to compliment Isotope 42 for his excellent commentary. Mark, thanks for your tip of the hat to me - I do not read this forum as often as I used to so this is the first I saw this discussion but Dick Rose's article and Isotope's commentary covers the questions. Here is a link for more rules articles from Dick Rose at Sailing World's website, including at least a couple that are closely related to this discussion: http://sailingworld.com/article_search.jsp?typeID=402&categoryID=726&m=4

BTW, Dick Rose has served on the USSA Rules committee since the early 70s and the ISAF rules committee since 1991, so while his articles are just his opinions, they are EXTREMELY knowledgeable and expert ones.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Damon Linkous 

Search

Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 367 guests, and 37 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Darryl, zorro, CraigJ, PaulEddo2, AUS180
8150 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics22,406
Posts267,061
Members8,150
Most Online2,167
Dec 19th, 2022
--Advertisement--
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1