| Reynolds 21 vs Stiletto 23 #239482 10/29/11 07:07 AM 10/29/11 07:07 AM |
Joined: Jul 2011 Posts: 56 soulofasailor OP
journeyman
|
OP
journeyman
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 56 | Has anyone had the chance to see or sail or know anything about these 2 boats? Just wanted to see what you all say, I am coming from a life of mono hull growing up but i have recently been branded with a feeling from a F24 and a F28r of SPEED.. I just cant get this feeling out of me 22 knots is fast i dont need to go any faster!  F-boats are way out of my price range right now. So my thoughts are Beach able some storage areas and at the most able to carry 8 people. I have close family here.. Some have never been sailing before. I will be sailing in Lake Erie and some closer inland lakes. Thanks | | | Re: Reynolds 21 vs Stiletto 23
[Re: soulofasailor]
#239489 10/29/11 10:45 AM 10/29/11 10:45 AM |
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,203 uk TEAMVMG
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,203 uk | The plus side for taking families sailing is that the passengers on a cat are between the hulls, as opposed to being outside the hulls on a tri. this gives a safer feel to being on a tramp cat. the downside of a cat is that it can fall over!
Paul
teamvmg.weebly.com
| | | Re: Reynolds 21 vs Stiletto 23
[Re: soulofasailor]
#239491 10/29/11 10:51 AM 10/29/11 10:51 AM |
Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 5,525 pgp
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,525 | I don't think having 8 people on either boat is safe, 3 or 4 max.
Pete Pollard Blade 702
'When you have a lot of things to do, it's best to get your nap out of the way first.
| | | Re: Reynolds 21 vs Stiletto 23
[Re: pgp]
#239493 10/29/11 12:27 PM 10/29/11 12:27 PM |
Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 713 WA, ID, MT davefarmer
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 713 WA, ID, MT | The R21 is a 1000 lb boat with a 31' mast, it'll see speeds in the high teens with 2 or 3 aboard in winds above 20 kts. You can take 4 to 6 people out in light air safely, if you take out large numbers of folk on either boat in bigger winds you risk breaking the boat. The 23 is larger and lighter, better top speed, subject to the same caution about big loads in high winds. The Reynolds has more below deck storage, more of a cruiser than the Stiletto. Either craft powered up will require skill to maintain control, both will require caution on a big lake when the wind is up. Both are nice boats.
Dave
Last edited by davefarmer; 10/29/11 12:40 PM.
| | | Re: Reynolds 21 vs Stiletto 23
[Re: soulofasailor]
#239510 10/30/11 01:19 PM 10/30/11 01:19 PM |
Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 713 WA, ID, MT davefarmer
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 713 WA, ID, MT | The travel to get a boat is just part of the cost of a boat that fits your needs, if you aren't willing to wait indefinitely for something closer. I'm in WA, and Flight Risk came from SF, as did the A cat. The HT and the ARC came from FL. The Reynolds came from Portland, and the Stealth and the 18 square came from SoCal. In half the cases I found catsailors I could bribe to drag the boats my direction. The 18 Magnum and the H21 are comfortable beachcats for 2 plus sailors, but the performance diminishes significantly with higher crew loads. The R21 is a much bigger boat with much greater freeboard, and a greater ability to carry loads, within above mentioned limits. All are well made boats that are fun to sail. Should you end up with the R21, I can connect you with Chris Park who bought mine, and has it nicely tricked out.
Dave
Last edited by davefarmer; 10/30/11 01:21 PM.
| | | Re: Reynolds 21 vs Stiletto 23
[Re: soulofasailor]
#239524 10/31/11 08:37 AM 10/31/11 08:37 AM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 778 Houston carlbohannon
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 778 Houston | If it makes a difference, a version of the Reynold's 21 is in production as the Z21. http://www.wingzsailboats.com/z21cruisingcatamaran.htmThis means there will be some level of parts support. I don't know the status of the company. There are questions about them being in buisness.
Last edited by carlbohannon; 10/31/11 10:00 AM.
| | | Re: Reynolds 21 vs Stiletto 23
[Re: soulofasailor]
#239527 10/31/11 09:11 AM 10/31/11 09:11 AM |
Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 35 Lake Norman. NC Matt_Z
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 35 Lake Norman. NC | I've owned both, sold the Reynolds a year and a half ago to buy a Stiletto. The question about keeping the boat in a mast up storage area or apart on a trailer is one you need to give a lot of thought to. Putting either of these together is not a quick, trivial thing. If I had to put either one together for a day sail, I'd look for something else. The Reynolds is a tank compared to the Stiletto, but depending on the winds in your area a tank might be what you need. If you need interior space, the Reynolds is the way to go. You could sleep 2 in the hulls if you had to, there's no way you could spend more than 5 minutes in the Stiletto hulls. I wouldn't put 8 people on either unless you had a light wind day. For a first catamaran you might be better off with the Reynolds. It's a much tamer boat with a Portsmouth rating of 84 if my memory's correct, compared to 59 on the Stiletto (with spin and light crew). Keep in mind that both of these are older boats and due to their size anything you might need to replace will cost more. Make sure the trampoline is in good shape.
Out of curiosity, are you looking at the Reynolds for sale in GA? If so, that's my old boat and it's in great shape. 23s can be hard to come by, it took me a while to find mine. Found it through someone on this site.
Last edited by Matt_Z; 10/31/11 09:19 AM.
| | |
|
0 registered members (),
483
guests, and 170
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |