| Re: Jules Verne
[Re: Timbo]
#242094 01/05/12 06:30 PM 01/05/12 06:30 PM | MN3
Unregistered
| MN3
Unregistered | | | | Re: Jules Verne
[Re: ]
#242095 01/05/12 07:02 PM 01/05/12 07:02 PM |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,490 On the Water P.M.
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,490 On the Water | Nah . . . both rookies. If you must, jump to 7:40 hang on
Philip USA #1006 | | | Re: Jules Verne
[Re: P.M.]
#242098 01/05/12 08:37 PM 01/05/12 08:37 PM | MN3
Unregistered
| MN3
Unregistered | Nah . . . both rookies. If you must, jump to 7:40 hang on you win thats crazy... | | | Re: Jules Verne
[Re: ]
#242100 01/05/12 09:27 PM 01/05/12 09:27 PM |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,490 On the Water P.M.
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,490 On the Water | Nah . . . both rookies. If you must, jump to 7:40 hang on you win thats crazy... silly me little do I know . . . this is insane
Philip USA #1006 | | | Re: Jules Verne
[Re: Timbo]
#242110 01/06/12 08:51 AM 01/06/12 08:51 AM | MN3
Unregistered
| MN3
Unregistered | What were you doing when you were 15?
I was playing guitar and chasing girls! That kid has a great combo of flamenco and bass slapping on an autistic guitar, but he doesn't come close to being faster than that insane picking Philip posted | | | Re: Jules Verne
[Re: jkkartz1]
#242137 01/06/12 07:16 PM 01/06/12 07:16 PM |
Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 55 PeteCullum
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 55 | | | | Re: Jules Verne
[Re: PeteCullum]
#242142 01/07/12 10:21 AM 01/07/12 10:21 AM |
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 465 FL sail7seas
addict
|
addict
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 465 FL | 29,002 miles in total ! at 26.5 knots! amazing numbers http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wb3vNTolWkE>>Well, a fast attack sub or aircraft carrier could theoretically beat the time on the JV course, it would not be "easy." The top speeds of these vessels are classified, but standard operation procedures would not allow these speeds for this length of time. The carrier would need to ditch the other ships in the carrier group (none of which could maintain 26 kt for any length of time), which would leave the carrier without defensive weapons and would require exceptional circumstances. The sub could not maintain this speed on the surface but could when submerged, however standard submerged cruise speeds are less than 26 knots, so you would need a very good reason to exceed standard speeds. Interestingly, BP5 has substantially exceeded the top speeds of both nuclear subs or aircraft carriers. While we do not know the precise limits they are certainly in the low 30 knot range. I believe that no nuclear powered ship has ever done 45 knots nor an 800 mile day, which BP5 has done several times. As a practical matter, I strongly suspect that 45 days for a 26,000nm non-stop route is a absolute record for a surface ship regardless of propulsion, wind, steam, oil, or nuclear. The other boats that might be able to beat that time, are extremely unlikely to attempt that course for practical reasons. << | | |
|
0 registered members (),
1,328
guests, and 30
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |