| Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation
[Re: mbounds]
#241783 12/22/11 08:56 AM 12/22/11 08:56 AM |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,490 On the Water P.M.
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,490 On the Water | 4.(a) -Two part mast
-Able to be shipped in a 6.1m (20 ft.) container
Philip USA #1006 | | | Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation
[Re: mbounds]
#241793 12/22/11 01:25 PM 12/22/11 01:25 PM | xanderwess
Unregistered
| xanderwess
Unregistered | Well, if they pick the Wave I am pretty sure we'll pick up a sh!t-ton more sailors in the racing groups........ | | | Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation
[Re: brucat]
#241802 12/22/11 07:38 PM 12/22/11 07:38 PM |
Joined: Oct 2011 Posts: 217 Palm Harbor, FL daniel_t
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 217 Palm Harbor, FL | Who here is directly affected by the equipment choice? My guess is that anybody who currently has a boat that is picked, and anybody who wants to buy the kind of boat that happens to get picked.
Daniel T. Taipan F16 - USA 213 | | | Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation
[Re: brucat]
#241810 12/23/11 09:10 AM 12/23/11 09:10 AM |
Joined: Oct 2011 Posts: 217 Palm Harbor, FL daniel_t
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 217 Palm Harbor, FL | Direct/indirect/no impact are decisions we make daily at work. Same logic applies here. Wow, such a restrictive definition of "direct." In that case, the olympic committee's choice impacts me more directly than most of what I hear in the news. I think it is safe to say that direct vs indirect is not a dichotomy, there are varying degrees of directness and we don't have to agree on where the line is drawn.
Daniel T. Taipan F16 - USA 213 | | | Re: ISAF Announces 2016 Olympic Mixed Multihull Evaluation
[Re: ]
#241846 12/24/11 10:34 PM 12/24/11 10:34 PM |
Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 894 Branford, CT rhodysail
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 894 Branford, CT | Well, if they pick the Wave I am pretty sure we'll pick up a sh!t-ton more sailors in the racing groups........ I think it would have the opposite effect, after an initial spike in Wave sailors in the first quadrennium you would see a big drop with a net loss in the number of Wave sailors by the second quad. Historically that’s the way things tend to go. | | |
|
0 registered members (),
1,088
guests, and 25
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |