| Mast Raking #55984 08/26/05 01:45 PM 08/26/05 01:45 PM |
Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 35 Hudson Valley whoa OP
newbie
|
OP
newbie
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 35 Hudson Valley | Two questions for anyone who's been there already. I am a rec sailor. I sail my 16 solo. I have decided to set up for raking the mast. I bought two nice new shrouds this winter and they measure around 18'11" to 19'1/4". Exact measurement doesn't matter as if pinned in bottom hole of adjusters and tensioned with jib halyard I still only measure about 4-5" difference between bow and stern measurements. Here are my two or maybe three questions: 1. Can I have a local hardware store re-crimp my shrouds if I cut the distance from the bottom to the top hole on the adjusters(Is that enough?) off of them. I don't have local sailboat shops near me. And I'd hate to buy a crimper for two crimps. I just don't know if hardware store quality crimping will keep my mast up. 2. Has anyone ever used the "On The Wire" tech tip from Roy Tally to convert stock seaway blocks to low profile blocks? If so are the 9 steps complete? Were you happy with results? 3. Does it always follow that you will have a problem with sheeting the jib if you don't compensate somehow? Hmmm, guess that's 6 questions. But I'll bet there are a couple that I didn't even know enough to address. I have searched the forums but still have these questions. Help!  Thanks, ralph | | | Re: Mast Raking
[Re: whoa]
#55985 08/26/05 08:35 PM 08/26/05 08:35 PM |
Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 152 Central Texas yoh
member
|
member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 152 Central Texas | Hmmm, If you bought Hobie 16 shrouds as a replacement for a new boat ... the new shrouds should be about 2 inches shorter than the old shrouds. I could measure my shrouds if this would help you out?! The new shrouds should allow for more than a healthy mast rake even without further shortening of the shrouds. Actually you should run in to trouble with the length of the forestay (should be too short) Regarding question 1... I would not do any DIY crimping on anything that holds the mast up. Not sure if I would let the local boat shop do it ... Masts are expensive so are heads. Question 2 ... sorry I have 6:1 Harken blocks. Question 3 ... not sure if I got that one... Do you refere to mastrake and jib cut? If this is the case ... kind of difficult... probabely means you would end up getting a new jib. Kind of difficult to compensate for the modification to the jib any other way. You might want to consider not raking to the absoulute max...
Patrick
Patrick, Hobie 16 '85
| | | Re: Mast Raking
[Re: whoa]
#55987 08/29/05 10:47 AM 08/29/05 10:47 AM |
Joined: Jan 2004 Posts: 152 Central Texas yoh
member
|
member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 152 Central Texas | when the forestay is attached to the upper adjuster(which I also added) Hmmm... If you have a "new style" forestay you should not need to make additional adjustments with a chain plate or other type of adjuster ... this should only be a requirement for the guys who use the shorter "new style" shrouds in combination with the "old style" (shorter) forestay. Here a chain plate can be used to make up for the lack in length of the old forestay. Question 3 .... The cut of a jib on a Hobie 16 was modified with introduction of the shorter shrouds (I guess in the early 90's) If you rake to an extreme (block to block while using some type of low profile mainsheet system) you will run into a problem where the clew of the "old style" jib will be relatively further down and slightly further back - causing problems sheeting in , especially when the jib traveler in all the way in. To compensate for this you could try modify some hardware -using some type of low profile block on the X bar, double pin the shackle at the clew to move the blocks closer to the jib (or even come up with some idea where the axle of the block would go threw one of the holes of the clew plate). Or you could get a new jib and a X bar with integrated traveler track ... OR… do not rake to the absolute max. You will be surprised what mast rake will do to your helm. Patrick
Patrick, Hobie 16 '85
| | | Re: Mast Raking
[Re: yoh]
#55988 08/30/05 05:49 AM 08/30/05 05:49 AM |
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 50 Roanoke, VA mattp
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 50 Roanoke, VA | I have gone through and am going through some of the things that you mention. I did replace my older generation shrouds with new that did allow for mast raking. They are shorter (don't know exactly how much). I kept the original forestay, for now, so I had to make up some length there by adding an additional adjuster plate. I also recently replaced trap wires which are shorter than the originals.
The boat sails great and seems less pitchpole prone now. The weather helm has increased significantly and it is something I need to fix or learn to enjoy the workout. I also have the issue with not being able to sheet the jib in far enough when sailing upwind. I am curious about the "seaway" block modification that you mentioned to make the lower profile. It seems like I have to sheet the jib to the max just to sail on a beam reach.
(Insert Witty Signature Here)
1988 H16
| | | Re: Mast Raking
[Re: mattp]
#55989 08/30/05 12:45 PM 08/30/05 12:45 PM |
Joined: Jun 2001 Posts: 1,252 California mmiller
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,252 California | Mast rake basics: Mast Rake is determined by shroud setting and jib halyard tension. The forestay is just for when the boat is not rigged. The forestay has to be long enough to stay slack when the mast is raked aft and jib halyard is tight. Should have a minimum slack of maybe 4" (often much more). When you sheet the main everything stretches. You want the entire rig load to stay on the wire inside the jib. If the forestay takes any load at all, the jib will not have a rigid leading edge and you will not be able to point. The distance between the mainsheet blocks (older blocks are stacked, newer ones are "low profile and allow more rake) determines how much rake you can get on a boat. Adjust the shrouds then tension the jib halyard. Check the main sheeting. Tension the sheets as tightly as you would for that days wind speed. When fully sheeted the blocks should touch or nearly so. If you have increased weather helm, you can re-drill the rudder blades to rake them forward (under the boat more). There are drilling descriptions on the Hobie Cat forum pages. There is a topic that handles cam, rake and alignment issues. http://www.hobiecat.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=467 If you cannot sheet the jib fully, you need to move the tack attachment point higher. If there is a luff tensioning line on the jib. Use it on the bottom and shackle the head at the top to move it even higher. You should sheet the jib so the clew blocks nearly touch the jib traveler car for the best possible. A jib that is too high pinches the air flow off up high between the main and jib. | | | Re: Mast Raking
[Re: mmiller]
#55992 08/30/05 06:46 PM 08/30/05 06:46 PM |
Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 35 Hudson Valley whoa OP
newbie
|
OP
newbie
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 35 Hudson Valley | "Mast Rake is determined by shroud setting and jib halyard tension." [color:"blue"]Matt, yes I understand that. However if I attach the shrouds in the lowest adjuster hole, and tighten up the jib halyard so that I have a fairly firm luff - my mast is pretty vertical  [/color] "The distance between the mainsheet blocks (older blocks are stacked, newer ones are "low profile and allow more rake) determines how much rake you can get on a boat. Adjust the shrouds then tension the jib halyard." [color:"blue"]I feel I must be missing something here - besides having too long shrouds, even though I just bought them.[/color] [color:"blue"]The jib sheeting info from Howard and you is also helpful, but doesn't solve my problem. I have a foot of sheet between my non low profile blocks, even when I put all 220 lbs into it. Thanks for all your feedback! [/color] | | |
|
0 registered members (),
703
guests, and 35
spiders. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums26 Topics22,406 Posts267,061 Members8,150 | Most Online2,167 Dec 19th, 2022 | | |