Originally Posted by brucat
Eric, regarding Case 15 here, I continue to respectfully disagree that it applies to the original case of this thread.

No, it applies to my previous statement "I'll go you one further and say that even if you AREN'T entitled to mark-room from (and in fact, even if you owe mark-room to) an outside/leeward boat, you CAN drive her beyond the mark. She can take you head-to-wind, but you are not obligated to tack, nor to give her room to tack."

I don't have an ISAF Case citation that is an exact match to the scenario posted, but then again, the boat entitled to mark-room tacked when she reached the layline. She didn't push the leeward boat away from the mark.

You asserted that a boat entitled to mark-room must tack within that mark-room, which is what we're discussing now. I asked you to justify that statement with a rule reference. Cases about how much room is enough, and how to interpret the term "seamanlike" are not germane.

Can you identify any rule, case, or appeal that states a boat is ever "obligated to tack and round the mark"?

Sincerely,
Eric