Very interesting...great start.

Comments and Questions:

1) Any reason for not putting more volume lower in the hull?

2) The profile looks hot but the head on view makes the hull cross section look quite dated… As if you have a very up to date profile, but a 20 + year old hull cross section.
Is picture # 123637 depicting the same hull as shown in picture # 123641? It may just be an optical illusion… but the picture shown with the rig on it looks like a “stretched out version of the non rigged hull. The picture of the hull ( #123637) looks stubby in comparison to the hull in picture (# 123641)

3) If you are going to have dagger boards why would you want such a deep V hull section? Small mono hulls are fun because they tack “on a dime” Would not a flatter bottom shape make the small cat tack much easier?

Best Regards,
Bob